Most probable macrostates of two Einstein solids

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yuriick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Einstein Solids
Yuriick
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider two Einstein solid A and B with N_{A} = 200 and N_{B} = 100. Suppose now that the oscillations of solids A and B are different. The energies of oscillators in solid A are measured in units of ε_{A}, so that the energy of solid A is U_{A} = q_{A} ε_{A}. Likewise, for solid B, the energy is U_{B} = q_{B} \epsilon_{B}. Assume that ε_{A} = 2ε_{B}, and that the total energy is 100 ε_{A}. Compute most probable macrostate

(Hint: to do this, you should write multiplicity/entropy of each solid and will have to and if/where one needs to take into account the fact that the units of energy of the two solids are different).


Homework Equations



(1) Sterlings approximation: \ln n! = n\ln n - n

(2) Multiplicity: Ω = \frac{(q+N-1)!}{(q)!(N-1)!}
There another forumla that says
(3) Ω = (\frac{eq}{N})^{N}

The Attempt at a Solution




U_{Total} = U_{A} + U_{B} = q_{A} ε_{A} + q_{B} ε_{B} = 100 ε_{A}
or
q_{A} ε_{A} + 2 q_{B} ε_{A} = 100 ε_{A}
q_{A} + 2 q_{B} = 100

This means that for each Ω_{A}(q_{A}) microstates of energy q_{A}, there are Ω_{B}(50 -\frac{q_{A}}{2}) microstates accesible to B.

The total microstate for partition of energy q_{A}, q_{B} is
Ω_{A}(q_{A})Ω_{B}(q_{B})

So the we can use (3),
Ω_{A}(q_{A})Ω_{B}(q_{B}) = (\frac{e q_{A}}{N_{A}})^{N_{A}} <br /> (\frac{e(50 - \frac{q_{A}}{2})}{\frac{N_{A}}{2}})^{\frac{N_{A}}{2}}<br /> <br />


I have no idea if what I'm doing is right. Any insight would be really appreciated, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Figured it out. For anyone who finds this thread:
Once you have Ω_{A} and Ω_{B}
Use

S = kln(Ω_{A}) +kln(Ω_{B})

Then we know that the most probable macrostate is when,

\frac{δS}{δq_{A}} = 0

So just solve for q_{A},then use it to solve for q_{B}.

I got
q_{A} = \frac{200}{3}
q_{B} = \frac{50}{3}
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top