Motion of 4 charges positioned in a square shape

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the motion of four equal charges positioned at the corners of a square, which, upon release, accelerate outward while maintaining their square formation. Participants debate whether this motion constitutes constant acceleration and explore the calculations needed to determine the common speeds of the charges at specific distances. The importance of using algebraic methods and Coulomb's Law to analyze the forces acting on each charge is emphasized, particularly in relation to the effects of the other particles. The conversation highlights the necessity of understanding superposition in order to solve for the speeds at different configurations. Overall, the thread focuses on the physics principles governing the motion of charged particles in a defined geometric arrangement.
Berker
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Four particles with equal charges q and equal masses m are placed on a plane so that
they form the corners of a square with side length a. The charges are then released from
rest at this configuration (shown as (i) in the figure). After the release, the particles
accelerate outward along the directions of the diagonals. As all charges are equal, they
keep the "square shape" they form, i.e., corners always form a square with side length
continuously increasing with time.
Adsız.png


(a) Is this a constant-acceleration motion?
(b) Consider the moment of time when the side length has reached the value 2a (shown
as (f ) in the figure). Let v be the common speed of the charges. Find v.
(c) Consider the time when the charges are infinitely far apart (i.e., side length is 1).
Find the common speed V∞ of the charges.

Homework Equations


F=[kq(1)q(2)]/r^2
F=q.E

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I do not need to think algebraically.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Berker said:
I think I do not need to think algebraically.
Then how are you planning on answering (b) and (c)? Both would appear to require an algebraic answer.
 
Just because you don't have values for "a" and "q" doesn't mean you don't need to think algebraically. You have Coulomb's Law as one of your equations. Think about superposition and pick one particle. How will the other particles affect that particle?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top