Motion of object (simple harmonic motion?)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around analyzing the motion of a ball dropped from a height of 4.00m that undergoes elastic collisions with the ground. Participants are tasked with demonstrating that the motion is periodic, determining the period of motion, and assessing if it qualifies as simple harmonic motion. To show periodicity, it's suggested to use energy conservation principles, while kinematic equations can help calculate the time for one complete cycle. The motion is recognized as periodic due to the ball's consistent drop and bounce back to the original height. Overall, the conversation emphasizes understanding the principles of motion and energy in this context.
~christina~
Gold Member
Messages
714
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ball dropped from height 4.00m makes an ellastic collision with the ground. Assuming no mechanical energy is lost to air resistance.

a) show that the motion is periodic

b) determine period of motion

c) is the motion simple harmonic?


Homework Equations



not sure how to approach "showing motion is periodic" so I don't know what eqzn to use

The Attempt at a Solution



a) show that the motion is periodic...

How would I technically show that??

I do know that it would be periodic since the ball hits the ground then bounces back up to the height it was dropped from but as to showing that...

b) period of motion.

well the period would be the time interval for the particle to go through one full cycle of motion but I'm not sure what to use there as well since in the book all they explain is the period as T= 2 \pi / \omega

can anyone help me out?

Thank you very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to draw a graph of position versus time for the motion of the ball (it drops, and rises, with a constant acceleration/deceleration) and see how long it takes for the graph to repeat itself.
 
a) I'd suggest showing this with energy equations. conservation of mechanical energy will work.

b) You should look to your kinematic equations to find the time it takes to complete one cycle, down then back up again.
 
thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Back
Top