Motion of Point P in Complex Plane: Finding z(t)

fizzo68
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The motion of a point P in the complex plane is defined by the
principal root of z^5= (1+ t)^i

a)find z(t)
b)Show that P is undergoing a circular motion. Find the velocity
and acceleration as a function of time

I'm pretty sure I know how to do b but I don't really understand the wording of the question. A is really confusing me. The 'Principal root' would that mean I have to take the root of both sides? and then just rearrange and isolate z?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The function z(t) describes the motion of the point in the x,y plane. So you need to take the fifth root of both sides of the equation to get z(t). As you know, there are 5 fifth roots of a complex number, you have to take the principal one. ehild
 
fizzo68 said:
The motion of a point P in the complex plane is defined by the
principal root of z^5= (1+ t)^i

a)find z(t)
b)Show that P is undergoing a circular motion. Find the velocity
and acceleration as a function of time

I'm pretty sure I know how to do b but I don't really understand the wording of the question. A is really confusing me. The 'Principal root' would that mean I have to take the root of both sides? and then just rearrange and isolate z?

Ask Dr. Euler for help.

(I have to confess, I never heard the term 'principal root' before. I believe, with deep conviction , that all roots are created equal.) :smile:
 
rude man said:
Ask Dr. Euler for help.

(I have to confess, I never heard the term 'principal root' before. I believe, with deep conviction , that all roots are created equal.) :smile:

well, there is a qualitative difference between the 2 roots of z4 - 1 = 0, 1 and i, in the sense that 1 is a power of i, but not vice versa.
 
Deveno said:
well, there is a qualitative difference between the 2 roots of z4 - 1 = 0, 1 and i, in the sense that 1 is a power of i, but not vice versa.

EIDT EDIT: Oops, I still get a straight line, magnitude [ln(1+t)]^0.2 and angle 0.2 rad.

Someone else please join in?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top