Motion on Ramp: Solving for x with Initial Conditions

  • Thread starter Thread starter coddy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Motion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around modeling the motion of a ball on a ramp defined by the function y=f(x), starting from an initial position X_0 with velocity V_0, under the influence of gravity. The user initially derives an expression for acceleration as a function of the ramp's slope gradient, f'(x), but struggles with the complexity of solving it. Suggestions include using conservation of energy to simplify the problem, which could also incorporate rotational energy if needed. The user explores different formulations for acceleration, questioning whether their initial expression is correct or if it requires adjustments, such as adding a square root. Ultimately, the goal is to express the ball's position as a function of time, allowing for the determination of its coordinates on the ramp.
coddy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I was wondering about the problem of having a "ramp" defined as y=f(x), and a ball (or other object) beginning at "X_0" with initial velocity "V_0" and being allowed, under acceleration due to gravity, to move frictionlessly on the ramp's surface.
I thought the easiest way to approach this is to take the component of its acceleration parallel to the x-axis (as it is the point of the x-axis which will through differentiation enable us to calculate the gradient of the slope at that point).
This is what i ended up with:

a = gf`(x)/(1+f`(x)^2)

Where g= -9.81 and f`(x) is the gradient of the slope at that point.

This gives me the acceleration as a function of the position on the slope...and i have no idea how to solve this. What I would ideally like to end up with is something in the form:

x=g(t)

where "g" is any function of t. But an implicit form wouldn't be too un-elegant...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi coddy! Welcome to PF! :wink:
coddy said:
I was wondering about the problem of having a "ramp" defined as y=f(x), and a ball (or other object) beginning at "X_0" with initial velocity "V_0" and being allowed, under acceleration due to gravity, to move frictionlessly on the ramp's surface.

Why not just use conservation of energy? :smile:
 
I say conservation of energy. This would also give you the advantage of being able to account for rotational ennergy of the ball should you choose to do so. However, this gives you V(y) where y is your height and V your velocity tangential to the ramp assuming you stay on the surface.
 
Is your expression for acceleration as a function of f'(x) missing a square root?
 
Now I'm more confused, I tried deriving the formula again and can't remember how i came to the original one. This is what i did this time:

On a triangle where "theta" is equal to tan^-1 (f`(X)), the component of "g" down the slope =g/sin(theta). Then draw a second similar triangle where the hypotenuse = g/sin(theta). The component of this parallel to the x-axis (horizontal) is gcos(theta)/sin(theta) = g/tan(theta) = g/f`(x), which gives me:

d^2 x / d t^2 = g/f`(x)

Which is is correct? The original, the original with a square root over the "1+f`(x)^2" or the one above??
 
Draw a right triangle with y vertical and x horizontal. Using f'(x) as the vertical y, and the value "1" as the horizontal x. Calculate Pythagorean theorem x2 + y2 = z2, or hypotaneus z = sqrt(x2 + y2). Now calculate sine(theta) = opposite over hypotaneus.
 
That gives me:

a=g.f`(x)/sqrt(1+f`(x)^2)

Which is the acceleration of the "ball". However, this is the acceleration of the ball parallel to the slope... I am only interested in acceleration which will affect the ball's x-coordinate, as this determines the balls change in x-position. Basically it's modeled as a one-dimensional line which the ball travels on...once i have a "x=p(t)" where "p" is a function, i can use the fact that "y=f(x)" and determine the balls actual postion (x,y)coordinates using parametric-style stuff...
Obviously i havn't done this, but I'm sure it would go a bit mental for 1-to-many functions...
 
Back
Top