Movement through an electric field

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done in moving a charge through a constant electric field, first determine the voltage difference between the initial and final points, as work is the product of voltage and charge. The electric field can be used to find the force acting on the charge, which is the electric field strength multiplied by the charge. Work can then be calculated using the force and the displacement vector. It's important to consider the direction of the electric field and the components of the displacement to ensure accurate results. Both methods should yield the same work value when applied correctly.
roanoar
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A constant electric field of magnitude E = 120 V/m points in the positive x-direction. How much work (in J) does it take to move the charge Q =11 μC from x1 = -67 m, y1 = -36 m, to x2 = 98 m, y2 = 75 m?

Homework Equations


You see that's the problem... I have no idea


The Attempt at a Solution


Its not much of an attempt but i know work is force times displacement right? So its just the force needed to move it times how far it is moved. But i don't know how to find the force needed to move it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
roanoar said:

Homework Statement



A constant electric field of magnitude E = 120 V/m points in the positive x-direction. How much work (in J) does it take to move the charge Q =11 μC from x1 = -67 m, y1 = -36 m, to x2 = 98 m, y2 = 75 m?

Homework Equations


You see that's the problem... I have no idea


The Attempt at a Solution


Its not much of an attempt but i know work is force times displacement right? So its just the force needed to move it times how far it is moved. But i don't know how to find the force needed to move it

There are two ways to approach this.

First you can determine the voltage difference between the two points. Since voltage is energy (or work) per unit charge, you will take the voltage difference times the charge to find the work done. Remember that voltage is the line integral of electric field over distance (vectorially with dot product).

Second, you can use the fact that electric field is force per unit charge. Hence electric field times charge tells you the force. You already described how to use force to calculate work done.

Try both methods and make sure you get the same answer either way. Remember that force and electric field is a vector, so be careful with direction and vector components.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top