Understanding the Conversion Between Miles Per Hour and Kilometers Per Hour

  • Thread starter Thread starter brycenrg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ph
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the confusion surrounding the conversion between miles per hour (mph) and kilometers per hour (km/h). Participants clarify that kilometers are longer than miles, which leads to the conversion factor where 1 mph equals approximately 1.6 km/h. The confusion arises from the perception that larger numbers should represent longer distances, but the rate of travel per hour must be considered. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that while kilometers are numerically larger, miles cover a greater distance, affecting the conversion rate. Understanding this relationship helps clarify the conversion process.
brycenrg
Messages
95
Reaction score
2
So I was thinking the other day why is kmph appear bigger than mph in conversions. I thought sense km was a bigger number it would be smaller because converting mi to KM u would reach .6 of a mile. Anyways I then I realized per hour is the rate at which it takes to travel that distant. So if i converted 1 mph to kmph it would be 1.6 because it takes a little quicker acceleration to reach 1 km than m. because km is longer than mi

like

----> = Mile
---------> = Km

Ahh I am confused now again lol. My brain doesn't understand why 1 mph would be .62 kmph because if you go ----> this distance per h which is a mile but then convert it to km wouldn't u have gone less in km because km is a bigger number.. lol I know I am wrong but i can't see it the correct way lol someone help
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Never mind.. a mile is bigger than a km Lol. Thats why i was confused.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top