Msc computational engineering (FEM) or Msc financial engineering

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the decision between pursuing a Master's in Computational Engineering or Financial Engineering, with a focus on career opportunities in financial markets and derivatives. It highlights that current hiring trends favor risk management and algorithmic trading over derivatives, particularly exotics. Finite Element Analysis (FEM) is deemed less applicable to financial problems, as financial dynamics are complex while boundary conditions are often trivial. The consensus suggests that a Master's in Computational Engineering may provide broader qualifications and better job prospects, especially in light of the unstable banking industry. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of flexibility in career choices and the diminishing gap between financial and non-financial computing salaries.
geol
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello and nice finding you!For a long time now I am thinking of financial markets and the world of derivatives as a very good future opportunity.Since I am a ''computational guy'' and in love with the finite element analysis,I decided to let my mind go of the Msc in geotechnical engineering and to start thinking of a Msc in computational engineering.Now my question is,what is the best to do?An Msc in computational engineering and a thesis or Phd on FEM and derivatives or going straight for an Msc in financial engineering?Thanks a lot guys for taking the time to read and answer my question! :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
geol said:
Hello and nice finding you!For a long time now I am thinking of financial markets and the world of derivatives as a very good future opportunity.

Derivatives (particularly exotics) aren't hiring. The current hiring revolves around risk management and algorithmic trading.

Since I am a ''computational guy'' and in love with the finite element analysis,I decided to let my mind go of the Msc in geotechnical engineering and to start thinking of a Msc in computational engineering.

Finite element analysis turns out to be almost useless for financial problems. Finite element works best when you have a set of dynamics that stay the same but you have complex and changing boundary conditions. In most financial problems, the boundary conditions are trivial but the dynamics are complex. So you see mostly monte carlo, a lot of finite differences, and maybe an analytic equation here and there.

Also if you are getting out soon, I'd have to say that oil/gas looks better than CS or finance right now.

Now my question is,what is the best to do?An Msc in computational engineering and a thesis or Phd on FEM and derivatives or going straight for an Msc in financial engineering?Thanks a lot guys for taking the time to read and answer my question! :biggrin:

Depends where you are. If you have working computer science experience, I'd skip the degree and talk to a recruiter that hires for financial companies. If you just have a bachelors, I'd recommend against a financial engineering degree because it's too niche.
 
Thanks for answering my question! I have heard something about pricing derivatives by using the FEM so I just told myself to give it a try.Moreover in an Msc of computational engineering I suppose I will broaden my horizons not only in FEM but also in several computational methods,that is why I have had it in my mind.So your opinion is that you recommend against the financial engineering Msc?

ps I am not getting out soon and I have bachelor. :smile:
 
geol said:
Thanks for answering my question! I have heard something about pricing derivatives by using the FEM so I just told myself to give it a try.Moreover in an Msc of computational engineering I suppose I will broaden my horizons not only in FEM but also in several computational methods,that is why I have had it in my mind.So your opinion is that you recommend against the financial engineering Msc?

Pricing derivatives with FEM is an interesting research topic, but it's not used in any production system that I know of, and that's because the specific mathematical form of derivatives don't fit into FEM. But these sorts of things can change quickly.

I tend to be very negative toward MFE's because you are hosed if the banking industry blows up, whereas with computational engineering, you can still apply for banking jobs, and avoid them if things blow up.

The only reason I'd even consider an MFE is if the school has good job placement, but that involves talking to actual alumni rather than reading the schools website. Also, if you have MFE alumni that can't find a job in finance but get decent jobs elsewhere, that's a very good sign.

Also going into geology isn't a bad move right now. One thing about finance is that you can still get good pay for good work, but the totally crazy salaries people were getting in the early-2000's are gone, and I don't think they are coming back anytime soon. The salaries are still decent, but the gap between financial computing and non-financial high end computing has shrunk considerably to the point that I don't think it makes any sense now to focus exclusive on finance.
 
Last edited:
twofish-quant said:
I tend to be very negative toward MFE's because you are hosed if the banking industry blows up, whereas with computational engineering, you can still apply for banking jobs, and avoid them if things blow up.
This is exactly what I believe and that is the reason why I was between these two Msc's.I consider that having an Msc in computational engineering will provide me a much better mathematical background and generaly more qualifications for many jobs,including finance!The reason I asked this question is just if somebody had any idea what financial institutions prefer better,the first one or the second one. :smile:

twofish-quant said:
Also going into geology isn't a bad move right now. One thing about finance is that you can still get good pay for good work, but the totally crazy salaries people were getting in the early-2000's are gone, and I don't think they are coming back anytime soon. The salaries are still decent, but the gap between financial computing and non-financial high end computing has shrunk considerably to the point that I don't think it makes any sense now to focus exclusive on finance.
In fact I am a geologist and I have just started a 5 year bachelor in mining engineering.. :smile:
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top