MSSM Higgs Potential Homework: Get Equ. (1.70)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Safinaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Higgs Potential
Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement



Hi,

I study the Higss sector of the MSSM from this review " arxiv:0503173v2", "The Higgs bosons in the Minimal Supersymmetric Model",

In Sec.: 1.2, it gives the Higgs potential by Equ. (1.60), then after acquiring the vevs and minimizing the potential to get the masses of the Higgs bosons , it yields two minimization conditions (1.70)

Homework Equations



I can not get Equ. (1.70)

The Attempt at a Solution



First I wrote the potential of the neutral components of the Higgs doublets: ## H_1,~ H_2##, as following:

$$ V_{H^0} = \bar{m}^2_1 |H^0_1|^2 + \bar{m}^2_2 |H^0_2|^2 + 2 B \mu H^0_1 H^0_2 + \frac{g_1^2+ g_2^2}{8} ( |H^0_1|^2 - |H^0_2|^2)^2.$$

Then minimized the potential
$$ \frac{\partial v }{\partial H_1^0} = \bar{m}^2_1 H^0_1 + 2 B \mu H^0_2 + \frac{g_1^2+ g_2^2}{4} ( |H^0_1|^2 - |H^0_2|^2) H^0_1=0, $$
$$ \frac{\partial v }{\partial H_2^0} = \bar{m}^2_2 H^0_2 + 2 B \mu H^0_1 -\frac{g_1^2+ g_2^2}{4} ( |H^0_1|^2 - |H^0_2|^2) H^0_2=0, $$

taking the minima Equ. (1.67), and using Equ. (1.68) and (1.61) in the reference, I got,
$$ ( \mu^2 +m_{H_1}^2) v_1 + 2 B \mu v_2 + \frac{M_z^2}{v^2} ( v_1^2 - v_2^2) v_1=0, $$
$$ ( \mu^2 +m_{H_2}^2) v_2 + 2 B \mu v_1 - \frac{M_z^2}{v^2} ( v_1^2 - v_2^2) v_2=0, $$
But then what I do to reach (1.70) ?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Obviously you can multiply the first equation by ##v_2## and subtract the 2nd multiplied by ##v_1## to solve for ##B\mu##. The opposite difference can be solved for ##\mu^2##. Then we have to eliminate ##v,v_1,v_2## in favor of expressions involving ##\beta##. It might be convenient to use (1.68) and (1.69) to express ##v_2 = v_1 \tan\beta##, ##v^2=v_1^2 (1+\tan^2\beta)##. Then the ##v_1## dependence cancels in the expressions for ##B\mu## ##\mu^2##, which are functions of ##\beta## and the masses.
 
Thanks, I got it..
 
Hi,

I preferred to continue in the same thread because I have a question in the same section of the referred reference:

Homework Equations



I can't get the mass matrices of the cp even Higgs scalars nor the cp odd, as Equ. (1.75) and (1.76)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I got the first element in the mass matrix of the cp even Higgs by:

## \frac{\partial V_H}{\partial H_1^0 \partial H_1^0} = ( \mu^2 + m_{H_1}^2 ) + \frac{3}{2} M_z^2 \cos^2 \beta ## ,

Now to get (1.75 ) matrix , at which this first term contains ##\bar{m_3}^2 ## or ## B\mu ## - Equ. (1.61)- , I tried to use the constrains (1.70 ), but did not reach it..

The mixed terms like ## \frac{\partial V_H}{\partial H_1^0 \partial H_2^0} ## are fine with me..

Bests.


 
Safinaz said:
Hi,

I got the first element in the mass matrix of the cp even Higgs by:

## \frac{\partial V_H}{\partial H_1^0 \partial H_1^0} = ( \mu^2 + m_{H_1}^2 ) + \frac{3}{2} M_z^2 \cos^2 \beta ## ,

Now to get (1.75 ) matrix , at which this first term contains ##\bar{m_3}^2 ## or ## B\mu ## - Equ. (1.61)- , I tried to use the constrains (1.70 ), but did not reach it..

The mixed terms like ## \frac{\partial V_H}{\partial H_1^0 \partial H_2^0} ## are fine with me..

You should be able to use the equations that you have in post 1 for ##\mu^2 + m_{H_{1,2}}^2## to write that in terms of ##B\mu## and ##M_Z## alone.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top