Multimeter Resistance and Error Compensation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around measuring current and voltage across rectifier and zener diodes using a multimeter, specifically focusing on the effects of the meter's internal resistance. It highlights that the multimeter's sensing resistor can introduce measurement errors, particularly when measuring in different bias conditions. The largest error is expected when measuring forward bias current due to the higher current flow compared to reverse bias. Understanding the voltage drop across the sensing resistor is crucial for accurate power input calculations. Proper compensation for the meter's effects is necessary to achieve reliable measurements in lab experiments.
brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi I have this lab about exploring rectifier diode and zener diode.

I have this question I have problem to answer.

"You measured the current through the diode (rectifier diode) and voltage across the diode using the multimeter in the lab.
Use a point in the reverse bias region and the forward bias region, make a reasonable estimate of the resistance of the meter, and compensate the effect of the meter. In what situation would you expect that this meter induced error would be largest
? "

Please can someone help me about this question please?

I don't see how to do it.
Thank you
B
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
in foreword baising the meter will induce error but does not effect in measurement.

its need some piuture to explain that i don't have it :)
 
brad sue said:
Hi I have this lab about exploring rectifier diode and zener diode.

I have this question I have problem to answer.

"You measured the current through the diode (rectifier diode) and voltage across the diode using the multimeter in the lab.
Use a point in the reverse bias region and the forward bias region, make a reasonable estimate of the resistance of the meter, and compensate the effect of the meter. In what situation would you expect that this meter induced error would be largest
? "

Please can someone help me about this question please?

I don't see how to do it.
Thank you
B

You are being asked about the sensing resistor inside the DVM in current measurement mode. The DVM measures current by measuring the voltage drop across this sensing resistor as the current flows through it. Typically larger resistors are used for measuring the lower current ranges, and smaller resistors are switched in for measuring the higher current ranges. Depending on the meter and the range, this series resistor can drop a voltage that then causes some error in the overall measurement.

For example, let's say that you are trying to measure the power input to an IC. You put your DVM in current mode on the 100mA scale, and connect it in series between your 5V power supply and your IC. You measure 30mA, but the power input to the chip is not 5V*30mA. Why? What do you need to do (and how many DVMs does it take) to measure the power input to the IC accurately?

Now, in your problem, assume that the DVM only has one current sensing resistor value (otherwise, you are not given enough information to answer the question). Will you get the biggest voltage drop across that sensing resistor when you have forward bias current flowing through it, or reverse bias current flowing through it? What are the typical forward and reverse current values that you measured in your lab?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
834
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Back
Top