Multiple dielectrics in one capacitor

AI Thread Summary
To determine the largest capacitance for a parallel plate capacitor using multiple dielectrics, one must consider the individual capacitances of each dielectric material and their arrangement. The capacitance for each dielectric can be calculated using the formula C = (κ)(ε)(Area)/(Distance), where κ is the dielectric constant. When dielectrics are stacked, they function as separate capacitors in series, leading to the equation 1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + ... + 1/Cn for total capacitance. The effective capacitance for multiple dielectrics is not simply the product of their dielectric constants; rather, it requires careful consideration of their arrangement and thickness. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Rake-MC
Messages
324
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm absolutely, completely and utterly stumped with this one question I've been given..

Here is the exact question:

Given that you possesses the following materials:
(i) two sheets of copper of uniform thickness;
(ii) one sheet of mica of uniform thickness 0.10 mm and dielectric constant κ= 6;
(iii) one sheet of glass of uniform thickness 2.0 mm and dielectric constant κ = 7;
(iv) one sheet of paraffin wax of uniform thickness 1.0 cm and dielectric constant
κ = 2;
determine which sheet, or combination of sheets, will produce a parallel plate capacitor of
the largest capacitance when placed between the copper sheets. Assume that all sheets
have the same shape.

Relevant equations that I have are:
C=(kappa)(epsilon)(Area)/(Distance)
V=V[initial]/kappa
but there are probably plenty more. I have equations for potential energy and such, but I'm not sure if they are necessary for the question.

attempt at a solution

Well as I said, I am completely stumped. I can calculate the capacitance of each dielectric on its own in the capacitor, but the combination ones are the ones I'm stuck with. This is what I've got so far {probably way off track}.

C[mica] = 6(epsilon)(area)/0.1x10^-3
C[glass] = 7(epsilon)(area)/2x10^-3
C[wax] = 2(epsilon)(area)/0.01

Can I ignore epsilon and area because they are common in all the equations?

for the dielectrics next to each other;

C[effective] = C[no dielectric]*k[1]*k[2]

This is most likely wrong. I know that for one dielectric, you can simply say that C[effective] = C[no dielectric]*k
where k = kappa

But I simply don't know how to derive a formula for multiple dielectrics.

Also, I do have knowledge of the theory of how dielectrics work, ie. how they generate opposing electric fields to that of the capacitor, but I am still 100% stuck with this question..Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have multiple sheets of dielectric stacked on each other, you can imagine that each sheet is a distinct capacitor and these capacitors are connected in series. The total capacitance C is then

\frac{1}{C} = \frac{1}{C_1} + \frac{1}{C_2} + \cdots + \frac{1}{C_n}
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top