Multipole expansion of polarized cylinder

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field on the midplane of a uniformly polarized cylinder at a large distance, the dipole term in the multipole expansion is the primary contributor. The attempt to use the multipole expansion for the top and bottom surfaces of the cylinder resulted in a total potential of zero due to their opposite charges. Instead of pursuing the multipole expansion further, it is recommended to calculate the effective dipole moment directly. This effective dipole moment can then be used in the dipole electric field equation to find the desired electric field. Focusing on the dipole term simplifies the problem significantly.
phys-student
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to calculate the electric field on the midplane of a uniformly polarized cylinder at a large distance from the center of the cylinder. The question also says that because the distance is large compared to the radius the dipole dominates the multipole expansion.

Homework Equations


Vdip=(1/4πε0)(1/r2)∫r'cosαρ(r')dτ'
V(r)=(1/4πε0)∑(1/rn+1)∫(r')nPn(cosα)ρ(r')dτ'

The Attempt at a Solution


The polarized cylinder only has charge bound on the top and bottom surfaces and I tried to do the multipole expansion for each disc separately using the 2nd equation and then add the resulting potentials together to get the total potential so I could find the electric field by taking the gradient. However the 2 discs have the same geometry and opposite charges so I ended up getting 0 total potential and then I can't find the electric field. What should I do?. I also tried using the first equation for the dipole potential but ended up with 0 again.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know that you're required to perform a multipole expansion? Since you are told that the dipole term dominates, I would think not. Just calculate the effective dipole moment, and put it into the equation for the electric field from a dipole.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top