Muon production and decay from relativistic annihilation

AI Thread Summary
An antiproton with 35 GeV energy collides with a proton in the upper atmosphere, resulting in the production of two muons, each with a mass of 106 MeV/c². The calculations indicate that each muon has an energy of 2053 MeV, leading to a kinetic energy of 1947 MeV. The muons' flight paths are affected by their angles of emission, which complicates the calculations for their survival probability as they travel a contracted distance of approximately 1.03 km due to relativistic effects. The survival probability, considering the muons' lifetime of 2.2 μs, is calculated to be around 0.2085, but concerns are raised about the accuracy of this value due to potential oversights in accounting for the muons' trajectories. The discussion emphasizes the importance of conservation laws and frame transformations in accurately determining the muons' behavior post-collision.
caitphys
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An antiproton of energy 35 ##GeV## from a source outside the solar system interacts with a proton in the upper atmosphere traveling on a trajectory which is radial with respect to the centre of the Earth. The antiproton annihilates the proton with the final outcome that two muons each of mass 106 ##MeV/c^2## are produced and nothing else. The interaction takes negligible time and occurs at a height of 20 ##km## above the Earth’s surface. For the case that both muons have the same energy, as measured from the Earth, what is the probability that they will both reach the surface? The lifetime of a muon is 2.2 ##μs##.

Homework Equations


[/B]
$$γ=\frac 1 {\sqrt {1 - \frac {v^2} {c^2}}}$$
$$E^2-p^2c^2=m_0^2c^4$$
$$p=γmv$$ and $$E=γmc^2$$
hence: $$p/E=v/c^2$$
$$KE=mc^2(γ-1)$$

And for later on in the question...
$$τ'=γτ$$
$$N/N_0=e^{-t/τ}$$

The associated probability that a particle survives/decays over a time t are: $$P(Survive)=e^{-t/τ}$$ $$P(Decay)=1 - e^{-t/τ}$$

The Attempt at a Solution



##(E_{\bar p}+m_ p)^2 - P_{\bar p}^2 = 4E^2##
##E_{\bar p}^2 + m_p^2 + 2E_{\bar p}m_p - P_{\bar p}^2 = 4E^2##
As ##E_{\bar p}^2-P_{\bar p}^2=m_{{\bar p}/p}##
##2m_p^2+2E_{\bar p}m_p=4E^2##
##E=\sqrt {{\frac 1 2}(m_p^2+E_{\bar p}m_p)}## = 4106.15MeV

So each muon has energy 2053MeV
##KE=E - m_0=2053-106=1947MeV##
##KE=(γ-1)mc^2##
so ##γ=19.368##

In the muon's frame the 20km distance is Lorentz contracted,
##20km/19.368=1.0326km##
##t=d/s=1032.63/0.99866c=3.44914μs##

##P(Survive)=e^{-3.44914/2.2}=0.2085##

-----

Issues I have:

Firstly, I'm pretty sure that I've ignored some of the content of the question that should be included to get an appropriate answer, such as the proton being on a radial trajectory.

Secondly, I'm pretty sure that the two muons produced should be traveling at angles to the normal, and so would have flight paths of distances greater than 20km, however I am unsure how to account for this in my calculations.

Finally, I don't have a lot of faith in the methods I have used, so apologies in advance if they're just straight up wrong.

Thanks for any help, I really appreciate it,
Cait
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!
caitphys said:

Homework Statement



An antiproton of energy 35 ##GeV## from a source ...
When I see statements like this, I'm not sure whether or not the energy given is the kinetic energy of the particle or the total energy (including rest mass energy). In this problem, it probably won't matter much since the rest mass energy of an antiproton is pretty small compared to 35 Gev.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
##(E_{\bar p}+m_ p)^2 - P_{\bar p}^2 = 4E^2##
This doesn't look right to me. Can you explain in words what this equation represents?

Issues I have:

Firstly, I'm pretty sure that I've ignored some of the content of the question that should be included to get an appropriate answer, such as the proton being on a radial trajectory.
This is related to your second question below.

Secondly, I'm pretty sure that the two muons produced should be traveling at angles to the normal, and so would have flight paths of distances greater than 20km, however I am unsure how to account for this in my calculations.
What can you get from conservation of linear momentum?
 
  • Like
Likes caitphys
Thanks for the response!

TSny said:
This doesn't look right to me. Can you explain in words what this equation represents?

Okay, so my thinking for ##(E_{\bar p}+m_ p)^2 - P_{\bar p}^2 = 4E^2## was that using ##A^2=(\sum\nolimits E)^2-(\sum\nolimits P)^2##,

Choosing my frame as that of the proton, since this seemed to minimise the impact of my confusion associated with its trajectory, for ##A^2## the first term is the energy of the antiproton and the rest mass of the proton, and the second just the momentum of the antiproton, given that in its rest frame the momentum of the proton shall be zero. Then, since ##A^2## is invariant, working in the ZMF frame after collision, as the muons have equal energies, the value of ##A^2## is merely the total energy squared, as total momentum will be zero, so ##(2E)^2##.

TSny said:
What can you get from conservation of linear momentum?

As ##P=\sqrt {E^2-m^2}=34987.4MeV##, conservation of momentum would suggest the two muons have momentums of half this, ##17493,71##, although I am ignoring any momentum the proton may have. From this I could calculate the velocity of the muons, as by conservation of energy, they have half of the antiproton's energy each, ##17.5MeV##, and so using ##v=\frac {pc^2} {E}##, ##v=0.99964c##

Finding γ and then using this to Lorentz contracting the distance (to 536.6m), I get a new survival probability of 0.44311

I've tried to use conservation of momentum here, but I'm not sure if it is fully realized, certainly the accompanying script for the problem stated that, "the main problem was that the students, almost uniformly, did not notice that the two muons would have to be going at an angle to the normal and that the flight path would therefore be longer".
 
caitphys said:
Okay, so my thinking for ##(E_{\bar p}+m_ p)^2 - P_{\bar p}^2 = 4E^2## was that using ##A^2=(\sum\nolimits E)^2-(\sum\nolimits P)^2##,

Choosing my frame as that of the proton, since this seemed to minimise the impact of my confusion associated with its trajectory, for ##A^2## the first term is the energy of the antiproton and the rest mass of the proton, and the second just the momentum of the antiproton, given that in its rest frame the momentum of the proton shall be zero. Then, since ##A^2## is invariant, working in the ZMF frame after collision, as the muons have equal energies, the value of ##A^2## is merely the total energy squared, as total momentum will be zero, so ##(2E)^2##.
This is fine.

As ##P=\sqrt {E^2-m^2}=34987.4MeV##, conservation of momentum would suggest the two muons have momentums of half this, ##17493,71##, although I am ignoring any momentum the proton may have. From this I could calculate the velocity of the muons, as by conservation of energy, they have half of the antiproton's energy each, ##17.5MeV##, and so using ##v=\frac {pc^2} {E}##, ##v=0.99964c##
Given the energy of the antiproton, it's reasonable to approximation to assume the proton is essentially at rest.

You've already switched back to working in the Earth's frame, and you're thinking of motion along just one dimension. I suggest you finish analyzing the collision in the center-of-mass frame, where it's relatively easy to do the calculations, and then transform those results back to the Earth's frame.

You reasoned that the two muons will have the same energy in the center-of-mass frame, and the problem statement says the muons also have the same energy as measured in the Earth's rest frame. Think about what this means about the direction the muons are moving in the center-of-mass frame.
 
  • Like
Likes caitphys
caitphys said:
Okay, so my thinking for ##(E_{\bar p}+m_ p)^2 - P_{\bar p}^2 = 4E^2## was that using ##A^2=(\sum\nolimits E)^2-(\sum\nolimits P)^2##,

Choosing my frame as that of the proton, since this seemed to minimise the impact of my confusion associated with its trajectory, for ##A^2## the first term is the energy of the antiproton and the rest mass of the proton, and the second just the momentum of the antiproton, given that in its rest frame the momentum of the proton shall be zero. Then, since ##A^2## is invariant, working in the ZMF frame after collision, as the muons have equal energies, the value of ##A^2## is merely the total energy squared, as total momentum will be zero, so ##(2E)^2##.
OK, this is correct as long as ##E## on the right side of the equation is interpreted as the energy of each muon in the ZMF. Personally, for this problem I find it easier to stick with the Earth frame. Using conservation of energy, it is easy to determine the energy of each muon in the Earth frame. The magnitude of the 3-momentum of each muon in the Earth frame is then easily obtained.

As ##P=\sqrt {E^2-m^2}=34987.4MeV##, conservation of momentum would suggest the two muons have momentums of half this, ##17493,71##
The momentum of each muon in the Earth frame is not equal to half the momentum of the antiproton. If you let the x-direction be the direction of motion of the antiproton, then you can easily use conservation of x-component of momentum to show that the x-component of momentum of each muon in the Earth frame is half the momentum of the antiproton.

Think about how to use this to determine the direction of motion of each muon in the Earth frame.
 
  • Like
Likes caitphys
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top