Natural Period of Vibration for Mass with Torque

adoado
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A body of arbitrary shape has a mass m, mass center at G with a distance of D and a radius of gyration about G of K. It is hanging, and pinned at the top. If it is displaced a slight amount of angle P from it's equilibrium position and released, determine the natural period of vibration.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



Sum of Torques = Ia. Hence, I = K2m

The torque applied by gravity: -mgDSinP = K2ma

Hence, mgDSinP + K2ma = 0
By the small angle approximation..

mgDP + K2mP'' = 0

Is this correct so far? I am lost at what to do next,

Cheers,
Adrian
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I just have to ask, you have not defined K so I'm not sure your derivation is correct.

Assuming it is correct, you just got your answer. HINT: Compare your final differential equation with the harmonic oscillator differential equation.

i.e.Compare
<br /> \ddot{x} + \omega^{2}x = 0<br />

with yours:

<br /> \ddot{P} + \frac{K^{2}}{g D} P = 0<br />
the rest is just identification.

Tell me if this was helpful, good luck.
 
Last edited:
Hello,

Thanks for that! I am a little confused about how the K2 coefficient moved from the angular acceleration to the angle, though? ^^
 
Oh my bad, just a typo. Here's the good one:

<br /> P + \frac{K^{2}}{g D} \ddot{P} = 0<br />

Just got the P miced up with the P'' for a second.
 
Cheers, thanks for that, I got it! :)

Thanks very much for that, I appreciate your help
Adrian
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top