Nature of photons presented in high school text books

AI Thread Summary
High school textbooks often associate photons primarily with visible light, neglecting other parts of the electromagnetic spectrum like radio waves and X-rays, which also consist of photons. The discussion raises questions about the existence of photons, suggesting that their finite number could eventually render light sources invisible to telescopes due to divergence. It also explores the nature of light waves, debating whether they should be represented as helical shapes rather than flat wave patterns. The consensus acknowledges that while photons are emitted in random directions, their vast numbers create the illusion of uniform emission from stars. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the complexity of understanding photons and their role in electromagnetic radiation.
hl_world
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Why did textbooks (when I was in high school 5 1/2 years ago) always associate photons with the visible light part of the EM spectrum. Wouldn't the radio, x-ray, gamma, etc. areas of the spectrum exist as photons too?

What about the transverse waves; would it not form a helix shape instead of the classic wave pattern on a flat plane? The former seems more realistic to me.

Do photons REALLY exist? Think about it - a particle of which there would be a finite number of in the universe. A light source emits a certain number of photons per 3 dimensional degree. Eventually, wouldn't said photons diverge enough that would render the light source invisible to any telescope (because no photons are available to enter the lens). It makes me think that radiation energy exists as a longitudinal wave (like sound through matter medium) but with some other unseen, unfelt, unknown medium.

Your thoughts?
 
Science news on Phys.org
From what I recall, "light" has erroneously been equated to "visible light."

I believe that in the simplest environment, a local vacuum, light waves (free photons) are sinusoidal and unpolarized.

The photon model fits with the vast majority of experimental and theoretical physics, from quantum mechanics to general relativity, from electromagnetism to thermodynamics.
 
I always thought "light" meant visible light. Ie, X-rays aren't light, they are x-rays. But all are forms of em radiation.
 
"Light" is sometimes used for electromagnetic radiation just beyond visible light, i. e., "infrared light" or "ultraviolet light."
 
i see what you mean by the point of no photons available to enter the telescope and what happens is light is not emitted by the start at any specific direction but photons are emitted at random directions every second or fraction of a second, and during this the photons emitted by the light reaches every possible region in the universe and since the number photons emitted is very large it looks like the star is emitting the photons in all directions, that is why sometimes the telescopes point at the same astronomical objects for seconds,minutes and sometimes hours.
 
Last edited:
hl_world said:
Why did textbooks (when I was in high school 5 1/2 years ago) always associate photons with the visible light part of the EM spectrum. Wouldn't the radio, x-ray, gamma, etc. areas of the spectrum exist as photons too?
Yes.
hl_world said:
What about the transverse waves; would it not form a helix shape instead of the classic wave pattern on a flat plane? The former seems more realistic to me.
You need to make a distinction between a classical wave (or the wavefunction of a photon if you like) and the internal field of the photon itself. You can get classical transverse waves and you can get classical helical waves (one just has a linear polarisation, while the other has a circular polarisation). Asking what the internal field of a photon however is like asking what the internal mass/charge distribution of an electron is - a question that, to me, doesn't make a great deal of sense.

hl_world said:
Do photons REALLY exist?
Yes.
hl_world said:
Think about it - a particle of which there would be a finite number of in the universe. A light source emits a certain number of photons per 3 dimensional degree. Eventually, wouldn't said photons diverge enough that would render the light source invisible to any telescope (because no photons are available to enter the lens). It makes me think that radiation energy exists as a longitudinal wave (like sound through matter medium) but with some other unseen, unfelt, unknown medium.

Your thoughts?
Probabilistically, the weaker a source the less photons per unit time will strike the detector. Thus the weaker a source, the longer we need to look to see a photon, which is a fairly well understood imaging principle. In practice our ability to detect a source is limited by the number of false positives (or dark counts) a photon counter tends to generate.

Claude.
 
In physics, the photon is the elementary particle responsible for electromagnetic phenomena.It is the carrier of electromagnetic radiation .
 
Back
Top