Nature of roots of quadratic equations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the values of k for the quadratic equation kx² - 3x + (k+2) = 0 to have two distinct real roots, requiring the condition b² - 4ac > 0. Initial calculations led to the incorrect conclusion of -3 < k < 3/4, while the correct range is -2.46 < k < 0.458. Participants identified errors in factoring and sign changes during manipulation of the inequality. There is speculation about a possible typo in the textbook or the original problem statement, as adjusting coefficients yielded the expected answer. The conversation highlights the frustration with inaccuracies in educational materials.
thornluke
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The equation kx2 - 3x + (k+2) = 0 has two distinct real roots. Find the set of possible values of k.


Homework Equations


Since the equation has two distinct real roots, b2 - 4ac > 0

The Attempt at a Solution


b2-4ac>0
9-4(k+2)(k)>0
9-4(k2+2k) >0
9-4k2-8k>0
= -4k2-8k+9>0
Multiply both sides by -1,
4k2+8k-9>0
(4k-3)(k+3)>0

-3<k<3/4

However the answer is -2.46<k<0.458
I'm lost, help please! :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
thornluke said:

Homework Statement


The equation kx2 - 3x + (k+2) = 0 has two distinct real roots. Find the set of possible values of k.


Homework Equations


Since the equation has two distinct real roots, b2 - 4ac > 0

The Attempt at a Solution


b2-4ac>0
9-4(k+2)(k)>0
9-4(k2+2k) >0
9-4k2-8k>0
= -4k2-8k+9>0
Multiply both sides by -1,
4k2+8k-9>0
(4k-3)(k+3)>0

-3<k<3/4

However the answer is -2.46<k<0.458
I'm lost, help please! :confused:
Your factoring is incorrect.

(4k-3)(k+3) = 4k2 + 9k - 9 .

Also, multiplying by -1 will change > to < .

Solve 4k2+8k-9 = 0 by using the quadratic formula --- or by completing the square.
 
SammyS said:
Your factoring is incorrect.

(4k-3)(k+3) = 4k2 + 9k - 9 .

Also, multiplying by -1 will change > to < .

Solve 4k2+8k-9 = 0 by using the quadratic formula --- or by completing the square.

((-8 ± √208)/8) < 0

-2.80 < k < 0.80

I'm getting closer to the "answer" (-2.46<k<0.458) am I wrong, or is the "answer" wrong?
 
I'm getting the same roots (-2.80 and 0.80).

When I played around with the coefficients of the original quadratic, I found that if you made the coefficient of the x2 term 2k:
2kx2 - 3x + (k+2) = 0
You will get the original answer that you stated: -2.4577 < k < 0.4577. So it looks like either you copied the problem incorrectly or the book has a typo somewhere.
 
The textbook's answer is consistent with -8k2 - 16k +9 > 0 . equivalent to -4k2 - 8k + 9/2 >0

It's hard to see how that's from a simple Typo -- unless the coefficient of x is should have been 3/√2 in the initial equation.
 
eumyang said:
I'm getting the same roots (-2.80 and 0.80).

When I played around with the coefficients of the original quadratic, I found that if you made the coefficient of the x2 term 2k:
2kx2 - 3x + (k+2) = 0
You will get the original answer that you stated: -2.4577 < k < 0.4577. So it looks like either you copied the problem incorrectly or the book has a typo somewhere.

I guess everyone makes mistakes.. it gets extremely annoying when textbooks provide you with the wrong answers or have a typo.
 
thornluke said:
I guess everyone makes mistakes.. it gets extremely annoying when textbooks provide you with the wrong answers or have a typo.

They are put there to help you to build self-confidence. :biggrin:
 
Back
Top