Need an opinion on this solution involving mathematical induction

nistaria
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, this is a problem given to us by our professor in one of the worksheets. I would like an opinion to see if this proof is valid

Homework Statement



Use mathematical induction to prove that 3^{n}+7^{n}-2 is divisible by 8 for \foralln\inZ^{+}

Homework Equations



Base step:
n=0
30+70-2=1+1-2=0
0 is divisible by 8 therefore it's true for n=0

The Attempt at a Solution


Inductive step
Assume that 3k+7k-2 is divisible by 8 is true.
We need to show that 3k+1+7k+1-2 is divisible by 8 as well

3k+1+7k+1-2 = 3*3k+7*7k-2
= 3(3k+7k-2)+4*7k+4

By inductive hypothesis we already know that 3k+7k-2 is divisible by 8 .
Now this is my problem, I'm also trying to show that 4*7k+4 is divisible by 8 as well. This is my attempt at trying to prove it

4*7k+4=4*(7k+1)

7k+1 will always be an even number for k\ge0. Multiplied by 4 this number will always be divisible by 8.
My question is do I still have to prove that 4*(7k+1) is divisible by 8 or is stating that is enough proof?

Thanks for reading
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The setup looks good, but if I were grading this I'd look for more detail on why 4 \left(7^k+1\right) is divisible by 8.

I admit my choice is probably specific to my teaching style, but quite often I see students making a ``it is obvious that it is true'' claim when

a) it isn't true

or

b) it is true but they aren't sure why

I can tell you know why it's true - it shouldn't be that hard to write out.

(My choice for more work may, and probably will, be commented on as a little harsh by others: I admit it's a personal choice).
 
Thanks for your input statdad, anything is appreciated! Knowing my teacher, she would look into specifics as well and that's why I had to ask.

I was thinking of proving that statement with another case by induction
( I gave up trying to use latex code, it's really messing up on me and not outputting the correct notations)

We are to prove that 4(7k+1) is divisible by 8 for k is a positive integer

Base step
k=1
4(7k+1)=4(71+1)=32
32 is divisible by 8

Inductive step
assume 4(7j+1) for j=k and that it is true.
We need to show that 4(7j+1+1) is true as well.
4(7j+1+1)=4(7*7j+1)
=28*7j+4=4(7j+1)+24*7j
by the inductive hypothesis 4(7j+1) is divisible by 8
24*7j is also divisible by 8 as the former is a multiple of the latter.
Therefore 4(7k+1) is divisible by 8
 
nistaria said:
Thanks for your input statdad, anything is appreciated! Knowing my teacher, she would look into specifics as well and that's why I had to ask.

I was thinking of proving that statement with another case by induction
( I gave up trying to use latex code, it's really messing up on me and not outputting the correct notations)

We are to prove that 4(7k+1) is divisible by 8 for k is a positive integer

Base step
k=1
4(7k+1)=4(71+1)=32
32 is divisible by 8

Inductive step
assume 4(7j+1) for j=k and that it is true.
We need to show that 4(7j+1+1) is true as well.
4(7j+1+1)=4(7*7j+1)
=28*7j+4=4(7j+1)+24*7j
by the inductive hypothesis 4(7j+1) is divisible by 8
24*7j is also divisible by 8 as the former is a multiple of the latter.
Therefore 4(7k+1) is divisible by 8

More than I expected :)

I was thinking that if you could argue 7^k + 1 is always even, then

<br /> 7^k + 1 = 2m<br />

for some integer m, so 4\left(7^k + 1 \right) = 8m is divisible by 8.
 
statdad said:
More than I expected :)

I was thinking that if you could argue 7^k + 1 is always even, then

<br /> 7^k + 1 = 2m<br />

for some integer m, so 4\left(7^k + 1 \right) = 8m is divisible by 8.
Oh I like that.. very simple and effective!
Thanks for the input, I am much obliged.
 
You could state that the product of two or more odd numbers is itself odd, that should be enough.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top