Need help on magnetic fields and free space

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the magnetic field generated by a long straight wire with a right-angle bend. The initial calculation provided is incorrect, as it only accounts for the curved segment of the wire. To find the total magnetic field at the specified point, one must apply the Biot-Savart Law for the curved section and consider the contributions from both straight segments, which do not cancel out. The right-hand grip rule indicates that both straight segments produce magnetic fields in the same direction. A comprehensive approach involves summing the magnetic fields from both the straight and curved parts of the wire.
andrew410
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
A very long straight wire carries current I. In the middle of the wire a right-angle bend is made. The bend forms an arc of a circle of radius r as shown in the figure below.
Figure: http://east.ilrn.com/graphing/bca/user/appletImage?dbid=1161207397

Lets say the permeability of free space is mu. So I believe the answer is ((mu*I)/(4*pi*r))*(pi/2), which equals to (mu*I)/(8*r).

It says the answer is wrong... Can anyone help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
what are you asked to solve? The magnetic field at the dot?
 
I'm assuming you want to find the magnetic field where the black dot is in the diagram. Working out the field due to the straights part of the wire is easy, it is as if there's one infinitely long wire carrying current I and distance r from the point where you want to find the B field. Working out the magnetic field due to the curved part of the wire is a tiny bit trickier, you need to use Biot Savart Law (give it a go). Finally you need to add the resultant B fields due to the straight & curved parts of the wire.

Edit: I noticed your answer is correct only for the curved part of the wire, and I'm assuming you thought that the two straight parts canceled out with each other, right? Well they don't. Use the right hand grip rule to see that they both produce a field in the same direction.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top