Need help setting a career path for the Space industry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on pursuing a career in the space industry and astronomy, emphasizing the importance of a strong educational foundation. A plan to major in physics and engineering, followed by obtaining a Ph.D. in physics, is considered reasonable for achieving this goal. It is suggested that choosing the right type of engineering can enhance preparedness for the field, with a focus on ensuring access to undergraduate research opportunities and relevant coursework. The conversation highlights the significance of attending a reputable institution, particularly for Ph.D. aspirations, and the potential benefits of transferring to a more prestigious school after starting at a local college. Additionally, the idea of double majoring in physics and engineering is mentioned, with the understanding that engineering expertise could be advantageous in the space sector. Overall, the emphasis is on strategic educational choices to maximize chances of success in the desired career path.
jkoster09
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm sure this is all something you hear a lot on this message board but I'd like to say it nonetheless. The space industry and astronomy at large are some of the only things I've ever felt passion for. I'd like nothing more than to work in that industry. My current plan is to major in physics and engineering (of some kind), and then get a Phd. in physics. I'm not afraid of any amount of work, so long as it gives me the best chance to do what I want.

Is this a reasonable way to get to my goal? Is my goal in itself reasonable? What kind of engineering should I do in order to be best prepared for this field? Beyond being accredited and having a decent reputation, does school matter that much? I understand that you got to a separate school for your PhD., should I go to the local college which would be dirt cheap for me, then transfer somewhere more prestigious in terms of physics, or find two good schools? (I have the University of Texas at Austin in mind currently)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your plan is to get a Ph.D in physics, then don't do a bachelor's degree in engineering (I'm not saying it's impossible. I'm saying it's easier to avoid switching fields).

School matters in the sense that if you want to get a Ph.D, you should have good access to undergraduate research and whatever classes you need. It doesn't hurt to have professors who are famous in the field, either (only if they can attest to your research potential, though!).
 
Sorry, I neglected to add that the idea of double majoring in physics and engineering. While the above advice still applies, I'd think that some kind of engineering expertise would be useful in this field. However, if this isn't true I'm not at all worried about it.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top