Need help understanding KE rotation

  • Thread starter Thread starter kurosaki69
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the understanding of kinetic energy (KE) in rotational motion, specifically using the formula KE = (1/2)Iw^2 and its translation to KE = (1/2)v^2/r^2. The variable 'v' represents the tangential velocity of a point on the rotating body, which is related to the angular velocity by the equation v = ωr. When considering a rolling object down an incline from rest, the velocity in question is indeed the velocity of the center of mass. In the case of a wheel rolling without slipping, the speed of the center of mass equals the tangential speed of the wheel's rim. This highlights the relationship between rotational motion and translational motion in rolling objects.
kurosaki69
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
i used the formula for KE rotation KE=(1/2)Iw^2 and i translated it to (1/2) v^2/r^2, but i wanted to know what does the v in the equation stand for. is it initial velocity or velocity of center of mass. if its is the velocity of center of mass can u tell me how to solve for it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether you know it or not, you made use of the relation v = \omega r, where v is the tangential velocity of some point on the rotating body and r is its distance from the axis.
 
ok thanks a lot my other question is what if the rotating object was rolling down a incline and it started at rest. would the velocity be the velocity of center mass of the object that is being rolled.
 
Let's take an example: A wheel, with radius r, rolls without slipping along some surface. The speed of its center with respect to the surface will be equal to the tangential speed of its rim with respect to its center.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top