Need help using the atomic form factor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lemenks
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic Form
Lemenks
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need to calculate interference peaks using the atomic form factor for several lattice types for a lab report. I was given the expected answers but told I should also be able to calculate them.Expected results for rocksalt (eg NaCl):

h+k+l = 2n
fh+k+l = 4(fa+fb)

h+k+l = 2n+1
fh+k+l = 4(fa-fb)

Homework Equations



Sk = ∑ fj(K)*e(iK.dj )

where fj(K) = atomic form factor = ∑p e(iK.rp )

dj = distance between to lattice points

rp = distance between to basis points

K = wavenumber

The Attempt at a Solution



For the geometrical form factor:

Sk= ∑e(iK.dh+k+l )

D(k-k`)=2πm or ei(k-k`)D=1

Sk= 1+ (-1)((n1+n2+n3))

This is the answer for a mono-atomic BCC lattice.

NaCl has atoms at basis points Na(0,0,0) and Cl 1/2(1,1,1).

Sk = ∑ ∑ e(iK.rp )*e(iK.dj )
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top