Need help with transformations of functions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding transformations of functions, specifically expansions, compressions, and reflections. Expansions and compressions can affect the y-values by multiplying them, while x-values are affected by multiplying before the operation, with different rules for values greater than or less than one. Reflections occur over the x-axis or y-axis depending on whether a negative multiplier is applied before or after the operation. For reciprocal transformations, traditional graphing methods are recommended to account for asymptotes and other behaviors, especially when dealing with fractions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of recognizing these transformations for accurate graphing.
Intr3pid
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
hi everyone

I have trouble recognizing expansions/compressions, and not knowing how draw graphs of recipricol transformations (of functions). can someone explain to me how to "do" them? or recommend a site that has a tutorial about it?

thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Ok, there are two types of expansion/compression. First, you have expansion/compressiion that affects your y value. Generally, you recognize this when you have a number times the x variable after some kind of operation is being performed (2x^2, 2*(x)^(1/2), etc). You simply take the original Y value and multiply it by this number to get your new Y value. If this number is greater than 1 you are "stretching" and if it's between 0 and 1 then you are "compressing" it.

Next, you have expansion/compression that can affect your x value. This will occur when the X is being multipled by some number BEFORE the operation is taking place like (2x)^2, (2x)^1/2, etc. However, the effect is a bit diffrent from what happened with the Y value a min ago. Whenever the number being multiplied by x is greater than 1, you take that numbers reciprocal and multiply it by the original x value to obtain the new x value. If it's less than 1 (IE a fraction), you will multiply by the reciprocal of the fraction (which is usually a whole number, since most problems of this type are 1/3, 1,4, etc)

Now for reflections. You will have a reflection of a number over the x-axis (just take the y value and change the sign) if x is being multiplied by something negative if the multiplication is occurring AFTER the operation (-x^2, -(x)^(1/2), etc).

You will have a Y axis reflection (change the signs of the x values) if the negative number is being multiplied BEFORE the operation (-x)^(2), (-x)^(1/3), etc.

I hope that wasn't too confusing and this helps you.:biggrin:
 
Just a few pratical examples for you

Vertical stretching: 2x^2
Vertical compression: (1/2)x^2

Horizontal stretching: (1/2x)^2
Horizontal compression: (2x)^2

X axis reflection: -x^2
Y axis reflection: (-x)^(1/2)

So in F(x)=-2(x+5)^(2)+3 for example you would graph x^2 then:
Move the graph left 5 units, multiply your x value by 2, change the x value's sign to obtain a reflection, then move it up 3 units.
 
Last edited:
what about recipricol transformations?
 
I'd just graph those in the traditional method finding points, intercepts, end behavior, etc, since you could end up with asymptotes and stuff that the transformations would neglect. That is, if the reciprocal of your original function contains fractions. If the reciprocal of the orgininal happens to end up being something nonfractional and you have a parent graph from which to use to transform it, then the same rules apply as what I listed above.
 
Last edited:
Concorde said:
I'd just graph those in the traditional method finding points, intercepts, end behavior, etc, since you could end up with asymptotes and stuff that the transformations would neglect. That is, if the reciprocal of your original function contains fractions. If the reciprocal of the orgininal happens to end up being something nonfractional and you have a parent graph from which to use to transform it, then the same rules apply as what I listed above.

no idea wat u're saying about recipricols.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top