Need integral help ( integral property maybe )

  • Thread starter Thread starter polosportply
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Property
polosportply
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
What is the \int(u)-1 where u is a fonction of x , forming a quadratic equation.
As in:

\int(u)-1 where u = x2+2ax+a2 for example.

Is there a basic property for this... or do I have to play around with the fonction u , in order to integrate?


----

I know that \int(x) = ln(x) , but this can't be applied here, right? because ln(u)' = u-1(u'). Maybe would I need to find a way to eliminate the u' as a result of the integral.

OR

Do I need to change u to = ( x+a)(x+a) and do the integer of that ^-1 , so: \int((x+a)^-1)((x+a)^-1)


----

Does anyone know an integral property for this kind of problem, or know of a way to set me on the right track here?

Thank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Since you know the integral of x-2 is -x-1, you should be able to do the integral of (x+a)-2. Hint: let y=x+a and get the relationship between dy and dx.
 
Ok, if I get what you're saying: u\equiv(x+a)

\int(u)-2= -u-1= -(x+a)-1I was onto that before, but then... if I do (-u-1)' = u-2u'So how come the (u') is not in the equation while doing the integral.
If I integrate something and then derive it, it should come back to the original term.

But apparently not cuz: (u-2)u'\neq(u)-2

**Is that what you meant mathman, or am I still off?
 
Since u=x+a then u'=1. Therefore u-2u' = u-2
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top