Need someone to double check a simple problem with sig figs

  • Thread starter Thread starter ksinelli
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving significant figures in a physics context. The user calculated -9.300 + 2.4 * 3.21 and arrived at -1.596, but the website indicated the answer should be -1.6. Clarification was provided that for addition, the result should reflect the least number of decimal places from the numbers involved, which in this case is one decimal place from 2.4. The user initially confused the rules for multiplication and addition but ultimately understood that the final answer should be rounded to match the least precise measurement. This highlights the importance of applying the correct significant figure rules in calculations.
ksinelli
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to get back into physics, and was brushing up on some very basic concepts. I came across this problem on a website tutorial.

"Solve -9.300 + 2.4 * 3.21"

It's a problem to practice rounding with significant figures. The instructions say to round to significant figures only when you reach a final answer.

So here's what I did.

2.4 * 3.21 = 7.704 (I left the three decimal places as the instructions say to only round at the end.)

-9.300 + 7.704 = -1.596

So I came up with an answer of -1.596, since there are 3 significant figures after the decimal place in both numbers for the addition portion of the problem.

But the website says the answer is -1.6

I don't understand why they rounded to two sig figs. Is this an error on the website, or am I not understanding something?

This is the website for anyone who wants to check it out. The problem is about midway down the page.

http://library.thinkquest.org/10796/ch1/ch1.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
ksinelli said:
I'm trying to get back into physics, and was brushing up on some very basic concepts. I came across this problem on a website tutorial.

"Solve -9.300 + 2.4 * 3.21"

It's a problem to practice rounding with significant figures. The instructions say to round to significant figures only when you reach a final answer.

So here's what I did.

2.4 * 3.21 = 7.704 (I left the three decimal places as the instructions say to only round at the end.)

-9.300 + 7.704 = -1.596

So I came up with an answer of -1.596, since there are 3 significant figures after the decimal place in both numbers for the addition portion of the problem.

But the website says the answer is -1.6

I don't understand why they rounded to two sig figs. Is this an error on the website, or am I not understanding something?

This is the website for anyone who wants to check it out. The problem is about midway down the page.

http://library.thinkquest.org/10796/ch1/ch1.htm

I believe that the rule is to round to the number with the least precision of the numbers you used to calculate it with.

In your case that would be the 2.4 number. Which implies the answer should be of the form xxx.x, so they expect you to round 1.596 to 1.6.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hm, ok. I think I understand what you're saying. You're saying that if you have a problem with multiplication and addition, you use the rule for rounding addition problems, but you include *all* the numbers in the problem, not just the numbers that were added?

If that's the case though, then what about this sample problem that is given..

3.6 * 0.3 + 2.1 = 1.08 + 2.1 = 3.18 = 3.2.

Wouldn't the answer just be 3 then, as 0.3 only has one significant figure?
 
ksinelli said:
Hm, ok. I think I understand what you're saying. You're saying that if you have a problem with multiplication and addition, you use the rule for rounding addition problems, but you include *all* the numbers in the problem, not just the numbers that were added?

If that's the case though, then what about this sample problem that is given..

3.6 * 0.3 + 2.1 = 1.08 + 2.1 = 3.18 = 3.2.

Wouldn't the answer just be 3 then, as 0.3 only has one significant figure?

If the statement of the problem had been 3.6 * .3 + 2 = ...
then the 2 with no decimal point would have suggested rounding to 3.

But with the least precision number showing 1 place after the decimal that's where I think you want to end up.
 
Wikipedia said:
Arithmetic

For multiplication and division, the result should have as many significant figures as the measured number with the smallest number of significant figures.

For addition and subtraction, the result should have as many decimal places as the measured number with the smallest number of decimal places.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Significant_figures
 
Oh ok. I understand now. In my second post I was going back to using the rule for rounding with multiplication and division problems, instead of the rule for addition and subtraction like you said. Silly me =/

Thank you much for the clarification :)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top