Neon Sign Light: Continuous Spectrum or Few Colors?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the light emitted by a neon sign represents a continuous spectrum or only a few colors. Participants agree that neon primarily emits in the red-orange region, indicating it produces only a few colors rather than a continuous spectrum. The conversation shifts to a related question about the Bohr model's compatibility with classical physics, with one participant noting that the assumption of fixed circular orbits contradicts classical mechanics due to centripetal acceleration. Further insights reveal that accelerating charges, like electrons in orbit, would lose energy and spiral inward, which is a violation of classical electrodynamics. Overall, the thread highlights key concepts in both light emission and atomic models.
Yael
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
need to hand in an assingment in an hour.
would appreciate help on this :

"Does the light emitted by a neon sign constitute a continuous spectrum or only a few colors? Defend your answer"

thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
And what is you take on the subject? Defend yourself.

P.S. This belongs in the homework section.
 
oops sorry !

well I've replied that the light constitute only a few colours because neon emits strongly in the red - orange region
mercury in ultra violet and so on. each element corresponds to different wavelengths.

though I'm not sure. i guess mainly because I'm not too sure what the question is asking me.
 
Yael said:
oops sorry !

well I've replied that the light constitute only a few colours because neon emits strongly in the red - orange region
mercury in ultra violet and so on. each element corresponds to different wavelengths.

though I'm not sure. i guess mainly because I'm not too sure what the question is asking me.

I think your answer is correct. The fact the neon lights have a very specific colour, as do sodium lights etc. kinda gives it away.

-Hoot:smile:
 
oh good thanks :)

another verification if you don't mind
the question asks if the Bohr model contredicts in any way classical physics.
i replied that only the first assumption that the electrons are fixed in circular orbits violates the laws of classical mechanics - of the idea of centripetal acceleration (?)
am i right to say that?
did i miss anything else? :-S
 
What's wrong with circular orbits?

(That was a rhetorical question...)

The answer is in classical electrodynamics and radiation. Another possible answer involves a violation of special relativity.
 
rachmaninoff2 said:
What's wrong with circular orbits?

(That was a rhetorical question...)

The answer is in classical electrodynamics and radiation. Another possible answer involves a violation of special relativity.
Yeah, what would happen if the electron were just spinning around in a classical orbit around the nucleus? Would there be a natural loss of energy for some reason?
 
berkeman said:
Yeah, what would happen if the electron were just spinning around in a classical orbit around the nucleus? Would there be a natural loss of energy for some reason?

Accelerating charges radiate an EM field. So if an electron were in orbit around, say, a proton it would slowly spiral inward as the electon's kinetic energy is lost to the outgoing EM field.

-Dan
 
Back
Top