Net force is Zero, quadratic answers

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the x-coordinate of a third charge, q3, positioned between two positive charges, q1 and q2, where the net force on q3 is zero. The solution indicates that q3 can be at x = 0.775m, derived from the equation 3x^2 + 8x - 8 = 0, while x = -3.44m is deemed unphysical. The negative solution implies that the forces acting on q3 would be equal but directed the same way, which is not possible for a positive charge. The analogy to a kinematic problem illustrates that the negative value represents a non-physical scenario, similar to a time reversal situation. Thus, only the positive solution is valid for the placement of q3 in this context.
flyingpig
Messages
2,574
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Three point charges lie along the x axis. The positive charge q1 = 15.0uC and is at x = 2.00m (2.00 away from the origin), the positive q2 = 6.00uC is at the origin. The net force on q3 which is between q2 and q1 is 0. What is the x coordinate of q3?


solution

My book (serway and jewett, 8ed, pg 665) says x = 0.775 from 3x^2 + 8x - 8 = 0

the other x = -3.44m

The book says the negative one is (and here I quote) "the magnitude of the forces on q3 are equal, but both forces are in the same direction".


Unfortunately I have no idea what that means, based on my knowledge, isn't the negative one just another point where it satisfies the conditon? So if it was moved to satisfy x = -3.44, then x = 0.755 would be rejected?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If every charge is positive, would it make sense that the third positive charge could lie on the left-hand side of the first two charges and not feel a force?

The -3.44m is an unphysical answer. It is kind of like the typical ball falling off of a cliff kinematic problem where if you were asked to calculate the time the ball hits the ground, you'll find 2 times due to the quadratic nature of the calculation. One relates to the real situation where the ball hits the ground on the right hand side and the other one is as if time were reversed and the ball went from the top of the hill to the ground in the opposite direction (though the hill is in the way...). I hope that makes sense...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top