B Neutrinos and Fermi-Dirac Distribution

TDanskin
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm an A level student currently trying to understand the behaviour and properties of neutrinos, and wanted to check that I've understood the basics of neutrino properties. As neutrinos are half-integer spin particles, can the Fermi-Dirac distribution be used to calculated the probable distribution of neutrinos in any system?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neutrinos are indeed fermions. I'm not sure what you mean by "Fermi-Dirac distribution". Usually one understands it to be the thermal-equilibrium distribution,
$$f=\frac{1}{\exp(E/T)+1}.$$
Since neutrinos are very elusive guys, it's very hard to imagine to have them in thermal equilibrium. Of course, in the very early universe they in fact were in thermal equilibrium.
 
vanhees71 said:
Neutrinos are indeed fermions. I'm not sure what you mean by "Fermi-Dirac distribution". Usually one understands it to be the thermal-equilibrium distribution,
$$f=\frac{1}{\exp(E/T)+1}.$$
Since neutrinos are very elusive guys, it's very hard to imagine to have them in thermal equilibrium. Of course, in the very early universe they in fact were in thermal equilibrium.
Thanks! Would it then be correct to say that, due to neutrinos being relatively non interactive compared to other fermions, the thermal-equilibrium distribution cannot predict their distribution in a system?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top