Newton Laws/Dynamics: 3 Masses on an incline

  • Thread starter Thread starter BitterX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Incline Newton
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the acceleration of a system with three masses on an incline, focusing on the interaction between masses M1 and M2. The key point is that if there is no relative movement between M1 and M2, they can be treated as a single body, but friction between them must be considered. The coefficient of friction (Mu) is crucial, as it influences whether M1 can keep pace with M2 when external forces are applied. There is a debate on whether the friction force can be ignored when treating the masses as one body, with implications for the final acceleration calculation. The conclusion emphasizes that the relationship between Mu and the acceleration is significant, especially under varying conditions of friction.
BitterX
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Mu1 is the friction coefficient , I'm sure I did it wrong because I got the acceleration isn't dependent on it, and it doesn't make sense.
disregard the axis in the drawing - it's for another question.

Homework Statement



Find an expression for the acceleration of the system when there is no relative movement between M1 and M2
(same acceleration and velocity?)


h.jpg


Homework Equations



ΣF =ma

The Attempt at a Solution



View attachment 1.doc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there is no relative movement between M1 and M2 then one can take (M1 + M2) as one body. The coefficient of friction is between the block and the inclined plane. Right?
 
forgot to mention: there's no friction between the incline and the mass 2 only between mass 1 and 2.
I don't think you can look at it as one body mass 1 can slip from mass 2 the friction is the only think that can make them move together (the only force that resist the Earth pull on mass1).

I don't know what the answer is. that's what I'm trying to find out!
 
It was given that there is no relative movement between M1 and M2. Of course there is friction between these two masses. But if these masses are considered as one body then this friction force will be an internal force and can be left out of our consideration.
 
Maybe you are right, then it's reasonable why I haven't got Mu in the answer :/
I don't have the final answer so I'm trying to find out if I'm right... these questions have grades.

My line of thinking is that if Mu will be a large number than m1 could go up along with m2 even if m3 is heavy (and thus the force pulling both of the masses up is greater) but if it would be very little m1 won't "keep up" with m2(if it's going up) .
and so the acceleration has to be dependent on Mu - though I could be wrong.

But thanks, it's really kind of you to help :)
 
It all depends on whether or not it is 'given' that there is no relative motion between M1 and M2.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top