Newtonian Mechanics/Forces Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the tensions in two cords suspending buckets, each weighing 3.5 kg. Initially, the user understands the force diagrams but struggles with how upward acceleration affects tension. It is clarified that the upward force is mediated by the tension in the cords, which increases when the system accelerates upward. The user realizes that the applied force is not external but rather the result of the tension itself, leading to increased tension in both cords. Ultimately, the user expresses gratitude for the clarification and acknowledges their understanding.
MyNameIsNicholas
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Member advised to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
4_41.gif


These buckets are being suspended. The cords have no mass and each bucket is 3.5 kg.

a.) Find the tension in the upper cord (T1) and the lower cord (T2)
b.) If the apparatus is pulled upwards from the top of the upper cord, what are the new tensions of each cord?

I understand the first part. The force diagrams consist of:
(Upper Bucket): T1 upwards, T2 downwards, and Fg downwards
(Lower Bucket): T2 upwards and Fg downwards

However, when the apparatus accelerates upwards, the tensions in both cords increases. This makes sense physically but in the force diagram isn't force applied (causing acceleration) going upwards? And if that were the case, then force applied would counter-intuitively decrease the tension within the cords. Can someone graciously clear this up for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Newton's second law applies to each bucket independently.
 
MyNameIsNicholas said:
4_41.gif


These buckets are being suspended. The cords have no mass and each bucket is 3.5 kg.

a.) Find the tension in the upper cord (T1) and the lower cord (T2)
b.) If the apparatus is pulled upwards from the top of the upper cord, what are the new tensions of each cord?

I understand the first part. The force diagrams consist of:
(Upper Bucket): T1 upwards, T2 downwards, and Fg downwards
(Lower Bucket): T2 upwards and Fg downwards

However, when the apparatus accelerates upwards, the tensions in both cords increases. This makes sense physically but in the force diagram isn't force applied (causing acceleration) going upwards? And if that were the case, then force applied would counter-intuitively decrease the tension within the cords. Can someone graciously clear this up for me?
I'm not sure why you would believe that's the case, but look at ##\sum F = ma##. Solve for the tension, and you'll see why hopefully. You may be confusing systems in equilibrium and accelerating systems while doing the FD.

Edit, trying to think of a good way to explain what I think is catching you up, but anyway, what's actually accelerating the system upward? The reactionary tension of course! The force that's pulling the system upward itself isn't applied to the buckets, its mediated by the tension in the rope.

Not sure if that helps or not.
 
Last edited:
I think I understand! The FA isn't actually an applied force. Well it is, but in terms of this problem it isn't. It's actually just addition upward tensional force on the upper cord FT1! This would, obviously, increase FT1 and in turn increase FT2. Thanks for the help and sorry for not using the proper format of my question. Merci.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2016-1-17_21-59-26.png
    upload_2016-1-17_21-59-26.png
    47.4 KB · Views: 515
  • upload_2016-1-17_22-0-11.png
    upload_2016-1-17_22-0-11.png
    5 KB · Views: 501
MyNameIsNicholas said:
I think I understand! The FA isn't actually an applied force. Well it is, but in terms of this problem it isn't. It's actually just addition upward tensional force on the upper cord FT1! This would, obviously, increase FT1 and in turn increase FT2. Thanks for the help and sorry for not using the proper format of my question. Merci.

Edit: Ignore those files. I was going to ask a follow-up question but upon creating those images and thinking about the question, it clicked!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top