Calculating Acceleration with Friction and Inclined Forces

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the acceleration of a 4.1-kg box pushed with a 21 N force at a 35° angle, it's crucial to accurately determine the normal force, which differs from the object's weight due to the angle of the applied force. The correct approach involves summing forces in both the x and y directions, leading to the equation Fn = mg + F sin(35°) for the normal force. After recalculating, the adjusted normal force is found to be 52.22 N, which affects the frictional force used in the acceleration calculation. The final acceleration, accounting for friction, is determined to be 1.648 m/s². Understanding the relationship between the applied force's direction and the normal force is essential for accurate calculations.
bumblebeeliz
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 4.1-kg box is pushed along a horizontal floor by a force of magnitude 21 N at an angle θ = 35° with the horizontal. If the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the floor is 0.20, calculate the acceleration of the box. Be careful when calculating the normal force.

Homework Equations



\SigmaF = ma
Ffr= \muk Fn
Fn=mg

The Attempt at a Solution



Fcos35°- Ffr = ma
21Ncos35° - \muk mg = ma
21Ncos35° - 0.20 (4.1 kg) (9.8 m/s2) = (4.1 kg) a
(17.2021N - 8.036N) / 4.1 kg = a
2.235 m/s2 = a


Is this correct or on the right track?
 

Attachments

  • assignment1_15.png
    assignment1_15.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 453
Physics news on Phys.org
bumblebeeliz said:
Be careful when calculating the normal force...
You ignored the warning! The normal force is not the objects weight. Sum forces in the y direction to calculate it.
 
Right. I thought that the Fn=mg was the tricky part. I never know when they equal to each other or not. Any tips?

Second try:

Fn - mg - F sin35° = 0
Fn = mg + F sin35°
Fn = (4.1kg)(9.80m/s2) + 21N sin35°
Fn = 40.18N + 12.045N
Fn = 52.22N

F cos 35° - Ffr = ma
F cos 35°- /muk= ma<br /> 21N cos 35° - (0.20)(52.22N) = (4.1kg) a<br /> (17.2021N -10.444N) / 4.1kg = a<br /> 1.648 m/s2 =a
 
I didn't check your math, but your method is now correct. Always draw free body diagrams of the object, and identify the forces acting on it. Break up those forces into their x and y components where necessary. Then apply Newton 1 or 2, as applicable, in the x and y directions, separately. This is what you have done. There is no net force in the y direction, since the block remains in contact with the table and does not accelerate vertically; in the x direction, there is a net force, and hence, an acceleration in that direction.
 
Great! Thanks again.:smile:
 
bumblebeeliz said:
Great! Thanks again.:smile:

I can't see the attachment yet, but consider the following.
If a force has a component pushing -up- on the mass, then the normal will be smaller. The force is supporting some of its weight, so the normal force doesn't have to be as strong in order to obtain equilibrium in that direction.
If the force has a component pushing -down- on the mass, then the normal will be larger. The force pushes the mass harder into the floor, meaning the reaction force will be greater.

Make sure your analysis makes sense in light of the above. I haven't seen the diagram, so I don't know if "35° with the horizontal" means it's being pushed up or down.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top