Examples of Newton's Laws of Motion in Practice

AI Thread Summary
Newton's Laws of Motion govern how objects behave in motion and at rest. The first law states that an object remains at rest or in uniform motion unless acted upon by an unbalanced force, illustrated by a chair remaining stationary due to balanced forces. The second law, F = ma, shows that acceleration depends on net force and mass, as seen in the differing acceleration rates of aircraft based on engine power. The third law emphasizes that every action has an equal and opposite reaction, demonstrated by a bird pushing against air to fly. Understanding these principles through practical examples enhances comprehension of motion dynamics.
pavadrin
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
hey,
i was wondering if somebody out there may be able to give me examples of Newton's Laws of motion in practise so that I would be able to grasp the concept of the these laws
thanks for your time,
Pavadrin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean "in practice"? Everything moves according to newtins laws of motion.
A simple example, you drop a rock from the height of 10m, at what speed does it hit the ground? So if you can firgure out the Force on the rock (mg) theb you can get the Acceleration (F = ma , 2nd law) and with that you can calculate the time that it takes to get to the ground and the speed that it's goin after that time.
In basiclly all questions regarding Newtons laws of motion you work in that order - calculate forces, then acceleration, then speed time and distance depending on the information. Sort of vague question though.
 
Law the First:

An object at rest tends to stay at rest and an object in motion tends to stay in motion with the same speed and in the same direction unless acted upon by an unbalanced force.

This means that, to change an object's velocity (or lack thereof) a net force needs to act on it. This happens...anywhere, really. Your chair stays where it is because the gravitational force is negated by the reactionary force of the floor (see third law). An aircraft gets continually faster as it's taking off because the thrust from the engines is larger than the drag caused by the air (until it reaches cruise, anyway). Basically - if the forces on an object don't completely cancel each other out, the object will accelerate.

Law the Second:

The acceleration of an object is dependent upon two variables – the net force acting upon the object and the mass of the object.

F = ma, as the poster above me stated. Going back to the aircraft example, a piston engine on a Cessna can accelerate the aircraft at a certain rate, reaching some velocity after a certain amount of time. If you tried to use that same engine and propeller on a 747, it would take much, much longer to reach that same velocity (ignoring drag, friction etc).

Law the Third:

For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Basically, when two objects interact, an equal and opposite force acts upon each of them. Take the chair example from earlier - your chair is exerting a force on the floor. To stop that chair from just going straight through the floor, the floor exerts a reactionary force back on the chair which is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction, creating (in this case) a net zero force. A bird pushes on the air in flight, pushing the air backwards, but the air also exerts a force on the bird's wing, pushing the bird forwards.

Does that help at all?

(BTW, credit should be given to http://www.physicsclassroom.com/Class/newtlaws/newtltoc.html" for the definitions. It goes into each of these laws in much more detail and was found on a Google search of "Newton's laws", amazingly enough. That crazy internet can do anything these days!)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
thanks Hawknc, that's an awsome post :smile: :smile:
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top