Calculating Net Force from Acceleration and Distance: A Problem Solving Approach

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the net force acting on a tennis ball that accelerates from rest to 40.5 m/s over a distance of 46.6 cm, proper formulas for accelerated motion must be used. The initial velocity is zero, and the correct formula to find acceleration without time is needed, such as using the area of a triangle in a velocity vs. time graph. The initial attempts to find time using constant speed equations were incorrect, leading to erroneous calculations of acceleration and force. Once the correct acceleration is determined, net force can be calculated by multiplying acceleration by mass. Accurate application of kinematic equations is crucial for solving such physics problems.
pookisantoki
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
When a 53.4g tennis ball is served, it accelerates from rest to a speed of 40.5m/s. The impact with the racket gives the ball a constant acceleration over a distancce of 46.6cm. What is the mgnitude of the net force acting on the ball?

I converted the 53.5g into kg=.0535kg
I converted 46.6cm into m=.466
So we have the distance, mass, force but not the net force.
I figured out the time by
40.5=.466/x
x=.01150secs
and figured out the acceleration byt 40.5/.0111506=3519.8
and then net force=acceleration * mass
f=.0534kg*3519.8=187.9599
But it's wrong, what am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Good idea to do those conversions right away.
I figured out the time by 40.5=.466/x
Looks like you used v = d/t to do this. But this is the d = vt that applies only to motion at constant speed. For this accelerated motion you could use d = Vi*t + .5*a*t^2.

The rest looks okay, but I recommend you clearly show what formula you are using to make your work easily readable by yourself and the rest of us (including the overworked and underpaid grad student who marks your tests).
 
Sorry!
So i did what you suggested and from where I found the time I plugged all the numbers into the formula you gave me: x=vt+.5at^2

.466=40.5*(.011506)+1/2a(.011506)^2
.466=.46599+1/2a(.000132388)
.932=.46599+a(.000132388)
7031.911=46599+a
a=7039.445

Then I plugged the "a" into the sum of forces=a*mass

7039.445*.0534= 375.906N but its coming up wrong...I'm not sure what I am doing wrong. Thank you
 
x=vt+.5at^2
.466=40.5*(.011506)+1/2a(.011506)^2

Your time is still wrong because you still used d = vt to find it.
Your initial velocity should be zero, not 40.5.

You know d, Vi and Vf. Do you have a formula for finding anything when you know only these quantities? An accelerated motion formula with no t in it would be perfect. Once you get the acceleration, you'll be able to find the force easily.

If you don't have such a formula (it is a more advanced one), you could use the very basic idea that the area under a velocity vs time graph is the distance. Sketch the V vs t graph for this situation and write in that its area is 0.466 m. The area is just a triangle, and you know the formula for area of a triangle, so you can make up a little formula with the width (time) being the only unknown and use it to find the time to accelerate the tennis ball.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top