Newton's Second Law question, 3 blocks acting to each other

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a system of blocks and a pulley, where the goal is to determine the tension in the string and the accelerations of the blocks after release. The user initially solved the problem using a method from Chegg but later sought clarification from their professor, who suggested using net forces to find acceleration relative to the ground. The user expressed confusion over the professor's explanation, particularly regarding the application of forces to derive acceleration. A suggestion was made to use the relationship between the blocks' accelerations to reformulate the problem in ground terms for better understanding. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying Newton's Second Law in different reference frames.
The Lich King
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Initially, the system of objects shown in figure is held motionless, the pulley and all surfaces and wheels are frictionless. Let the force F be zero and assume that m1 can move only vertically.
upload_2016-10-14_5-50-47.png

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6xlSNQyGbU5M3FTSXpNSVdmT2c/view?usp=sharing

2. Homework Equations

At the instant after the system of objects is released, find (a) the tension T in the string. (b) the acceleration of m2, (c) the acceleration of M, and (d) the acceleration of m1.

The Attempt at a Solution


For this problem I figured it out first based on the solution from Chegg. The key was to use the relationship between the accelerations of M and m2. I think by using the tension force divide by m2 can find out the acceleration of m2 with respect to the block M at the beginning. However after I asked my professor about this problem, he told me that by using the net force exerting on an object divide by its mass can always find out the its acceleration with respect to the ground. But in this way I could not figure out how to solve this problem again. I think if what my professor had said was right then by using the force exerting on m2, I can find out the acceleration of m2 with respect to the ground very easily then I can write (m1g-T)/m1=T/m2 which will give me a wrong answer. I am confused about this problem. Please tell me what is wrong and if I misunderstood what my professor had said. Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you have already solved the problem using relative motion, you can use the relationship to derive the equation entirely in terms of the ground-frame, to give you an insight into what your prof was saying.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top