Newtons third law and quantum mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the limitations of Newton's laws, particularly the third law, in the context of quantum mechanics. It highlights that while Newton's laws apply to classical systems, they fail to accurately describe interactions at the quantum level, where concepts like force are less relevant than energy. The uncertainty principle complicates the ability to predict electron paths, as demonstrated by experiments like the double slit experiment. Additionally, it is noted that the positions of protons and neutrons are not precisely known, but their uncertainties are generally smaller than those of electrons due to their greater mass. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the need for different frameworks to understand atomic interactions in quantum mechanics.
shivakumar06
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
dear sir,
we know that third law of motion says that every action has a equal and opposite reaction. quantum mechanics tells us that it is possible not predict the position as well as the speed of electron. i like to know if electrons ,protons and neutrons form a system called atom. each of the components interact with each other and we also know where the protons and neutron are in nucleus and their speed. my question is if i am correct why can not we have a equation for path of electron?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Newtons laws are not correct in the quantum realm.
In fact Newton's third law isn't even correct for many systems in the Newtonian realm.
 
In quantum mechanics, reference is usually not made to the concept of force like in Newton's mechanics. The relevant concept in QM is that of energy, similar to classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics.

It is possible to demonstrate by several experiments, like the double slit experiment, that a particle can "be in several places at once" between consequent measurements of its position. Therefore, its useless to try to make a theory where electrons have a definite trajectory.
 
HomogenousCow said:
In fact Newton's third law isn't even correct for many systems in the Newtonian realm.

Yes, in a system with magnetic forces the 3rd law is not valid in its original form.
 
and we also know where the protons and neutron are in nucleus and their speed. [/QUOTE]
No, we don't know the position of neither the protons nor of the neutrons but the uncertainty of the position of these particles is usually smaller to the uncertainty of the position of the electrons due to the larger mass of protons and neutrons. To show that Newtons third law is valid in QM one can express the force F acting on an electron as ## F=\frac{i}{\hbar} [H,p]## and the corresponding force acting on a nucleus as ##\frac{i}{\hbar} [H,P]##, where p and P are the momentum operators of the electron and nucleus, respectively. Now as ##P+\sum p## is a constant of motion for an atom also in QM (i.e. it commutes with H), the force acting on the nucleus must equal the sum of the forces acting on the electrons.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top