How Do Newton's Third Law and Forces Affect Hockey Player Collisions?

AI Thread Summary
In a collision between a 100 kg and a 112 kg hockey player, both players exert a force of 50N on each other, leading to different accelerations due to their masses. The 100 kg player experiences an acceleration of -1.0 m/s², while the 112 kg player has an acceleration of 0.89 m/s². Newton's Third Law states that forces are equal and opposite, but the resulting accelerations differ because acceleration is inversely proportional to mass. The net force on the system is zero, but the individual forces acting on each player are significant enough to cause movement. Understanding this principle clarifies the confusion regarding the players' motion after the collision.
hya_been
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So I have a homework question that says:
A 100 kg hockey player a 112kg hockey player collide with each other each traveling with a force of 50N.

The textbook answer says that the acceleration of the 112kg is 0.89m/s^2
and the acceleration of the 100kg player is -1.0 m/s^2.

I'm confused because according to Newton's third Law there will be equal and opposite reaction forces so wouldn't they not move? Is the textbook wrong or am I?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember by the second law:

F = m a

They both impart a force of 50N on each other, but the acceleration is also scaled by their masses. 50N on a 100kg person will push them farther than 50N on a 112kg person.


Imagine pushing a shopping cart with 50N. An empty shopping cart will go really far, whereas a full shopping cart will go a much shorter distance. In both instances the force is the same, but:

a = \frac{F}{m}
 
calculating acceleration

So you do 100/100 and 100/112 even though the total of the forces equals 0 because its 50 + -50??
 
The net force of the entire system is 0, but the force on each player is of magnitude 100N. You can find the acceleration of each player using

a = \frac{F}{m}. Knowing F = 100N and m = 100kg for person 1,

a = \frac{100N}{100kg} = 1.0m/s^2

F = 100N and m = 112kg for person 2:

a = \frac{100N}{112kg} = 0.89m/s^2
 
Thank You!

Thank-you you are a saviour!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top