No problem, glad I could help! Keep up the good work in your studies.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jbjeens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinant
Jbjeens
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I'm a bit confused on how I would compute a Vandermonde Determinant to a matrix. Is there a set formula I need to memorize? Any help would be appreciated. Maybe even a reliable link that could give me a step by step procedure on how to compute this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what you mean. There is no such thing as "a Vandermonde determinant" of an arbitrary matrix. There is a special matrix, the "Vandermonde matrix", whose determinant comes up in some places, so it is a well-known quantity. See e.g. http://www.proofwiki.org/wiki/Vandermonde_Determinant.
 
Landau said:
I am not sure what you mean. There is no such thing as "a Vandermonde determinant" of an arbitrary matrix. There is a special matrix, the "Vandermonde matrix", whose determinant comes up in some places, so it is a well-known quantity. See e.g. http://www.proofwiki.org/wiki/Vandermonde_Determinant.

Hi Landau,

Thanks for the reply! Fortunately, I now understand the Vandermonde Determinant. I learned it on my own last night. And yes! I also understand that it isn't just for any matrix! Your reply is much appreciated. Thank you!
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Back
Top