Non-canonical form into canonical transformation 1-d partial dif.

photomagnetic
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Problem 29. Use the subtraction trick U(tilda) = U−U1 to reduce the following problems
with non-canonical boundary conditions to the canonical ones and write down the
equations in terms of the variable ˜u (do not solve them). Note that there are
infinitely many u1’s that solve each problem—try to find the simplest ones.
(a) Heat equation
ut = Uxx , x ∈ [0, l] ,
with the following boundary conditions
(a.1) u(0, t) = U(l, t) = A ,
(a.2) Ux(0, t) = 0 , U(l, t) = A ,
(a.3) U(0, t) = A , U(l, t) = B ,
(a.4) Ux(0, t) = Ux(l, t) = A ,
(a.5) Ux(0, t) = A , Ux(l, t) = B .
(b) Wave equation with dissipation and a perturbation on one end
Utt + aUt = c
2Uxx , x ∈ [0, l]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I am using
U1(x,t)= a(t)+(x-c).b(t)

then U(x,t)=U(tilda)(x,t)+U1(x,t)

I can find the U1's but not U(tilda)
is that enough to transform them into canonical form?
I'm googling like a mad man but no luck so far. can't find any good sources.
you don't have to answer the question but a little help would be nice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
I've found the correct method.
Thanks anyway.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top