Non-linear multivariable functions

m~ray
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I wanted to know if there is any way of classifying the set of all non-linear multivariable functions. I wish to analyse something over all possible non linear functions with 4 variables. In fact these variables are binary variables. for example f(x,y,u,v)= x.y - u\oplusv
 
Physics news on Phys.org
m~ray said:
I wanted to know if there is any way of classifying the set of all non-linear multivariable functions. I wish to analyse something over all possible non linear functions with 4 variables. In fact these variables are binary variables. for example f(x,y,u,v)= x.y - u\oplusv

If you are concerned with classification, it is important to explain exactly what structure we have here. Are ##x,y,u,v## elements of some vector spaces? Are the products maps to the same or a different vector space, or perhaps field?

There are some well-studied objects with a structure that might be relevant for your problem. A bilinear map is a function

$$B: V \times W \rightarrow X,$$

where ##V, W, X## are vector spaces and ##v \mapsto B(v,w)##, ##w \mapsto B(v,w)## are linear maps.

In the case where ##W=V## and ##X = F## is actually a field, we have a bilinear form:

$$ V : V\times V \rightarrow F.$$

Closely related to this is the notion of a sesquilinear form.

If your function of interest fits one of these categories, it might be possible to find additional information that might be relevant to your question.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top