Nonconservative work kinetic friction problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a nonconservative work kinetic friction problem involving two objects, A and B, with masses m_A and m_B, respectively. The objects slide against each other experiencing constant kinetic friction, leading to a decrease in their relative speed from v_i to v_f. The author concludes that the derived equations for kinetic energy changes imply that m_A equals m_B, which is deemed absurd. The error lies in the assumption of inertial frames, as the objects are accelerating and thus their rest frames are non-inertial.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic friction and its properties
  • Familiarity with Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy and its equations
  • Concept of inertial vs. non-inertial reference frames
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of kinetic friction and its role in work-energy problems
  • Study the differences between inertial and non-inertial reference frames
  • Explore the implications of nonconservative forces in mechanical systems
  • Analyze examples of kinetic energy changes in systems with friction
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of kinetic friction and nonconservative work in mechanical systems.

inkliing
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
This isn't homework. I'm reviewing physics after many years of neglect. As with most of my posts, I made this problem up.

Let object A have mass m_A and object B have mass m_B. One of A's surfaces is flat, as is one of B's. These flat surfaces are in contact and slide relative to each other in a straight line for a distance, x, experiencing kinetic friction. The kinetic friction, of magnitude f, is constant and is the only force acting on A or B in the direction of motion, and the only other forces acting on A and B are the normal forces pressing the surfaces together. The normal forces are assumed to be equal and opposite, so that the only acceleration of the objects is in the direction of friction. No net force acts on the center of mass.

During a finite time interval, the speed of each surface relative to the other decreases from v_i to v_f due to friction. The nonconservative work done by each surface on the other is W_{noncons} = -fx since each surface experiences the same displacement and the magnitude of the frictional force exerted by each surface on the other is the same since the two frictional forces comprise a force/reaction force pair.

Therefore the change in kinetic energy of A, \Delta K_A as seen from B's restframe is equal to the change in kinetic energy of B, \Delta K_B, as seen from A's restframe, since we are assuming that no other forces accelerate the objects.

Therefore \frac{1}{2}m_A v_{f}^{2} - \frac{1}{2}m_A v_{i}^{2} = \Delta K_A = \Delta K_B = \frac{1}{2}m_B v_{f}^{2} - \frac{1}{2}m_B v_{i}^{2} \Rightarrow m_A = m_B, an absurd result.

Something's wrong and it's driving me crazy! Please help me find the error in this reasoning, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try analyzing things from an inertial frame. Since the objects are accelerating, their rest frames are non-inertial.
 
Thank you! It was staring me in the face.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K