Nonuniform Circular Motion: Old-Fashioned Amusement Park Ride

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a physics problem involving nonuniform circular motion in an amusement park ride. The scenario describes passengers inside a rotating cylinder with a focus on determining the minimum angular speed required for safety after the floor drops away. Key equations related to friction and centripetal acceleration are referenced, emphasizing the importance of free body diagrams (FBD) for analysis. Participants clarify the correct approach to include the passengers in the calculations and confirm the accuracy of the diagrams. The exchange highlights common challenges in understanding word problems and the collaborative effort to resolve confusion.
Go Boom Now
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Sorry for having my first post be a question, I guess. I'm just confused as to how to do this since I've never really been one for word problems. I can't really type in... tex(?) either. Oh well, here we go:

Homework Statement


In an old-fashioned amusement park ride, passengers stand inside a 5.0-m-diameter hollow steel cylinder with their backs against the wall. The cylinder begins to rotate about a vertical axis. The the floor on which the passengers are standing on suddenly drops away! If all goes well, the passengers will "stick" to the wall and not slide. Clothing has a static coefficient of friction against steel in the range of 0.60 to 1.0 and kinetic coefficient of friction in the range of 0.40 to 0.70. A sign next to the entrance says "No children under 30kg allowed." What is the minimum angular speed, in RPM, for which the ride is safe?


Homework Equations


Kinetic Friction Force = Coefficient of Kinetic Friction x Normal Force
Static Friction Force = Coefficient of Static Friction x Normal force
F-net = mass x acceleration = (mass x (tangential velocity^2)/radius
Tangential Velocity = (2pi x radius)/period = angular velocity x radius


The Attempt at a Solution


Check the attachment. I was following the steps my teacher outlined (FBD in r, t, z components, net force equations, solve). I'm not sure if my diagrams or FBD are correct though because the people are also involved... do I just bundle them up in the steel cylinder?

Sorry, I'm just confused.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4726.jpg
    IMG_4726.jpg
    48.6 KB · Views: 1,072
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Go Boom Now! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Go Boom Now said:
Sorry for having my first post be a question …

That's normal! :biggrin:
F-net = mass x acceleration = (mass x (tangential velocity^2)/radius
Tangential Velocity = (2pi x radius)/period = angular velocity x radius

Check the attachment. I was following the steps my teacher outlined (FBD in r, t, z components, net force equations, solve). I'm not sure if my diagrams or FBD are correct though because the people are also involved... do I just bundle them up in the steel cylinder?

yes, centripetal acceleration = v2/r = ω2r (even if ω isn't constant)

your only body for a free body diagram is the person, so i don't understand what you mean about including them in the cylinder :confused:

your diagrams, and your z equation, look ok

your x equation (i think you know) is normal force = mass times centripetal acceleration (and that's where you start)

what is worrying you about that? :smile:
 
I drew the wrong kind of diagram (I misinterpreted the question), which is why I ended up getting confused. I managed to figure it out after I read your post. Thanks for the help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top