Nonuniform Semicircle of Charge problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter littlebilly91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the y-component of the electric field at the origin due to a non-uniformly charged semicircle. The charge density varies with angle θ, expressed as λ = +5.8θ μC/m. Participants clarify the integration process, emphasizing the correct expression for the differential charge dq, which should be dq = λRdθ, and discuss the integration limits from 0 to π. The correct approach leads to the conclusion that the electric field E should be positive, indicating its direction towards the negative charge. The final consensus is that the integration and charge density considerations are crucial for arriving at the correct solution.
littlebilly91
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A non-uniformly charged semicircle of radius R=28.0 cm lies in the xy plane, centered at the origin, as shown. The charge density varies as the angle θ (in radians) according to λ = + 5.8 θ, where λ has units of μC/m.
(picture included)
What is the y - component of the electric field at the origin?

Homework Equations



dE=\frac{dq}{4\pi\epsilon r^{2}}sin\theta

where \epsilon = 8.85*10^{-12}

\theta r = s

\lambda=\frac{q}{s}
-------------------------------------------

The Attempt at a Solution



First I derived (5.8*10^{-6})\theta^{2} r=q

and took the derivative 2(5.8*10^{-6}) r \theta d\theta=dq

substituted into equation 1
dE=\frac{2(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}\theta sin(\theta)d\theta

Integrated from 0 to pi.
E=\frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{2\pi\epsilon r}\int\theta sin(\theta)d\theta

The whole integral simplifies down to pi,which cancels out and leaves
E=\frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{2\epsilon r}

I am getting 1.17*10^{6} N/C for an answer, but it's not correct.
Thanks for the help in advance.
 

Attachments

  • semicircle.gif
    semicircle.gif
    4.6 KB · Views: 1,373
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First I derived (5.8*10^{-6})\theta^{2} r=q

It's supposed to be (5.8*10^{-6}/2)\theta^{2} r=q. A less roundabout way of doing this is to note that dq=λ*dL and dL=Rd(theta), so dq=λRd(theta).
 
ideasrule said:
It's supposed to be (5.8*10^{-6}/2)\theta^{2} r=q. A less roundabout way of doing this is to note that dq=λ*dL and dL=Rd(theta), so dq=λRd(theta).

why is that? I'm not seeing where that 2 came from. Does the 2 come in before the derivative because it's only half a circle?
 
A better question would be how you got (5.8*10^{-6})\theta^{2} r=q in the first place. Didn't you use dq/dl=λ, dq=λ*dl=λ*R*dθ?
 
I used \theta r = L and \lambda=\frac{q}{L} to get \lambda=\frac{q}{\theta r}. I substituted 5.8\theta for lambda and rearranged to solve for q. I didn't know how else to take the nonuniform charge into account.

Again, thanks for the help.
 
Lambda does not equal q/L because the charge density varies across the circle. Try using the method I described: dq=λ*dL and dL=Rd(theta), so dq=λRd(theta).
 
Okay, I understand why I was wrong before. Is it correct to go from dq=λRd(theta) to dq =5.8(theta)Rd(theta)?
 
Yup, that's correct.
 
Integrated from 0 to pi.
E=<br /> \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}\int sin(\theta)d\theta<br />

=>(skipping a few steps) =>
E=<br /> \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}(2)
I believe that would be correct.
And it should also be positive because it points towards the negative charge, right?
 
  • #10
Yeah, it's positive.
 
  • #11
thanks so much for the help!
 
  • #12
littlebilly91 said:
Integrated from 0 to pi.
E=<br /> \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}\int sin(\theta)d\theta<br />

=>(skipping a few steps) =>
E=<br /> \frac{(5.8*10^{-6})}{4\pi\epsilon r}(2)
I believe that would be correct.
And it should also be positive because it points towards the negative charge, right?

How did you get rid of the
<br /> (\theta) from \int (\theta)sin(\theta) to \int sin(\theta)<br /> [\tex]
 
Back
Top