Noob ques: probability of each J state

empirekhoo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An electron with spin down is in a state of (n=5,l=1,ml=0) of hydrogen atom. If you could measure the total angular momentum squared of the electron, what values might you get, and what is the probability of each state.


Homework Equations


J^2 = j(j+1) * hbar^2 (i mean the eigenvalue of operator J^2)


The Attempt at a Solution


the first part is easy.
J^2 = .75 hbar^2, J^2 = 3.75 hbar^2

but I have no idea how to solve the second part (perhaps i forgot). Any idea/input is welcomed! was it insufficient information?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have a state that is

| \ell = 1, m_\ell = 0\rangle\otimes |s=\tfrac{1}{2}, m_s = - \tfrac{1}{2}\rangle.

This state can be written in terms of the states |1,\tfrac{1}{2}, j,m_j\rangle by using the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.
 
fzero said:
You have a state that is

| \ell = 1, m_\ell = 0\rangle\otimes |s=\tfrac{1}{2}, m_s = - \tfrac{1}{2}\rangle.

This state can be written in terms of the states |1,\tfrac{1}{2}, j,m_j\rangle by using the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.

Ah of course.. It wasn't taught in lecturer.. (disappointing)

Anyway I've looked into the CG table (for the first time) and I wonder was my method correct:

1. my table is alike last page of http://www3.tsl.uu.se/thep/courses/QM/061027-exam.pdf"

2. looking into 1 x 1/2, then on the 0, -1/2 row. I get:

3. sqrt(2/3) | 3/2, -1/2 > + sqrt(1/3) | 1/2, -1/2 >

4. am I right? or am I abusing the table? (I'll reply by saturday.. busy week)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks good to me.
 
fzero said:
Looks good to me.

ah okay! thanks a bunch! I'll read on with direct product later when I'm free =)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top