Normal Force during centripetal acceleration

AI Thread Summary
When swinging a ball on a string, the existence of a normal force depends on the observer's perspective. An outside observer sees no normal force, as tension in the string accounts for the centripetal motion. However, from the ball's perspective, a pseudoforce appears to act outward, but this does not constitute a normal force since it lacks contact with a surface. The discussion emphasizes that normal forces require a physical surface for contact, and the concept of pseudoforces is relevant in non-inertial reference frames. Understanding these principles clarifies the dynamics of centripetal acceleration in different frames of reference.
prospectus
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
General Question Here:

Let's say you are swinging a ball around on a string. Will there be a normal force?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's a good question and it depends on your perspective.

If you take the view point of an outside observer, then no. There is the tension in the string, the circular speed and the radial acceleration; all motion is accounted for from that perspective.

If your view point is from the ball, then yes. There is a pseudoforce acting on you that pulls you away from the center. That pseudoforce is the normal force, which is opposite from the acceleration.

It's not a topic that I have much depth on, but that is what I know.

Research non-inertial reference frames for more.
 
Thank you. It makes sense that there would be no normal force because there is no surface acting on the ball.
 
You're welcome.

I'd just like to append what I said with this:
What I described from the view point of the ball would not be a normal force either. That is still a pseudoforce.
A normal force always requires contact with a surface.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top