Normalisation of harmonic oscillator classical action

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the transition amplitude for a harmonic oscillator, specifically focusing on the classical action and its normalization. The original poster presents a wave function at time zero and seeks to find its form at a later time using the transition amplitude expression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to compute the wave function at a later time using an integral involving the transition amplitude. They express confusion regarding which Gaussian integral to apply due to the presence of both imaginary and real coefficients in the exponent.
  • Some participants suggest that the Gaussian integral formula can be applied as long as certain conditions regarding the coefficients are met, prompting further exploration of the integral's structure.
  • Others question how to properly format the integral to utilize the Gaussian integral result, indicating uncertainty about the application of the formula.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the Gaussian integral and its application in the context of the problem. There is no explicit consensus yet, but some productive guidance has been offered regarding the conditions under which the integral can be evaluated.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of integrating expressions with both real and imaginary components, and there is an emphasis on ensuring the conditions for the Gaussian integral are satisfied. The original poster's confusion about the integral's evaluation reflects the challenges posed by the problem's setup.

CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87

Homework Statement


The transition amplitude for the harmonic oscillator may be written as ##\langle x_2, t_2 | x_1, t_1 \rangle = N_{\omega}(T) \exp(i/\hbar S_{cl})##, where ##T=t_2-t_1## and ##S_{cl}## is the classical action. Let the wave function at ##t=0## be ##\psi(x,o) = \left(\frac{mw}{\pi \hbar}\right)^{1/4} \exp(-mwx^2/2\hbar)##. Find ##\psi(x,t)##

Homework Equations


[/B]
##\langle 0, T | 0, 0 \rangle \equiv \langle 0, t_2|0, t_1 \rangle = N_{\omega}(T)##
Classical action, ##S_cl = \frac{mw}{2 \sin w T} (-2x_1 x_2 + \cos w T(x_1^2 + x_2^2))##

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
##\psi(x,t) = \int dx' \langle x,t |x',t' \rangle \psi(x',t')##Evaluate for ##t' = 0## gives $$\psi(x,t) = \int dx' \langle x,t |x',0 \rangle \psi(x',0) $$ which is $$= \sqrt{\frac{mw}{2\pi i \hbar sin wt}} \left(\frac{mw}{\pi \hbar}\right)^{1/4} e^{\frac{i}{\hbar} \frac{mw}{2 \sin wt} x^2 \cos wt} \int dx' e^{\frac{i}{\hbar} \frac{mw}{2\sin wt} (x'^2 \cos wt) - 2xx')} e^{\frac{-mwx'^2}{2 \hbar}}$$
I am just a bit confused on what Gaussian integral I should use to compute this? I was thinking $$\int e^{iax'^2 + bx'} dx' = ..$$ but the ##x'^2## term has both imaginary and real coefficients. I've tried completing the square too but no progress. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi king vitamin,
king vitamin said:
The formula for the Gaussian integral you give (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common...grals_with_a_complex_argument_of_the_exponent for example) should work for any complex value a in the exponent as long as the imaginary part of a is positive.
Hmm so I should write it like $$\int dx' e^{x'^2(A+if(t)) + ig(t)x'}?$$ I'm just not sure how to then apply the result $$\int dx e^{iax^2 + bx} = \sqrt{\frac{i\pi}{a}} \exp(-ib^2/4a)$$ Thanks.
 
<br /> \int dx&#039; e^{x&#039;^2(A+if(t)) + ig(t)x&#039;} = \int dx&#039; e^{i (f(t) - iA) x&#039;^2 + ig(t)x&#039;} = \sqrt{\frac{i \pi}{f(t) - iA}}\exp\left(-ig(t)^2/4(f(t)-iA)\right)<br />

Which can be simplified. But remember that A must be negative.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K