Normalization of a symmetric wavefunction

phosgene
Messages
145
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I need to find the normalization constant N_{S} of a symmetric wavefunction

ψ(x_{1},x_{2}) = N_{S}[ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2}) + ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1})]

assuming that the normalization of the individual wavefunctions ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2}), ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1}) are both just 1 and not orthogonal.

Homework Equations



For a symmetric wavefunction ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2}) = ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1})

3. Attempt at solution

I do the normalization and get N_{S}^2∫_{-∞}^{∞} 2 {|ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2})|}^{2} + ψ*_{a}(x_{1})ψ*_{b}(x_{2})ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1}) + ψ*_{a}(x_{2})ψ*_{b}(x_{1})ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1})dx_{1}dx_{2}=1

Now, since the wavefunctions are symmetric, ψ*_{a}(x_{1})ψ*_{b}(x_{2})ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1}) = ψ*_{a}(x_{2})ψ*_{b}(x_{1})ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1})

Since the answer is supposed to be N_{S}=1/\sqrt{2}, I'm guessing that ψ*_{a}(x_{1})ψ*_{b}(x_{2})ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1}) = 0, but I don't know why this would be.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you might have saved yourself some work by just applying the equality at the beginning, I think.

ψ(x_{1},x_{2}) = N_{S}[ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2}) + ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1})]
ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2}) = ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1})
ψ(x_{1},x_{2}) = 2N_{S}ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2})But in case you were wondering what to do with your later expression

\left(a^* + b^*\right)\left(a + b\right) = a^*a +b^*b + a^*b + ab^*

= |a|^2 + |b|^2 + (a^*b) + (a^*b)^*
Adding a number to its complex conjugate eliminates the imaginary component and doubles the real component.
= |a|^2 + |b|^2 + 2Re\left\{a^*b \right\}

Consider what happens when a = b.

Edit: perhaps I'm missing something though
 
Last edited:
MisterX said:
Well, you might have saved yourself some work by just applying the equality at the beginning, I think.

ψ(x_{1},x_{2}) = N_{S}[ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2}) + ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1})]
ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2}) = ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1})
ψ(x_{1},x_{2}) = 2N_{S}ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2})

But if I do this and try to normalize it, won't I get

N_{S}^2∫_{-∞}^{∞}4|ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2})|^2 dx_{1}dx_{2}

which gets me N_{S}=1/2

MisterX said:
But in case you were wondering what to do with your later expression

\left(a^* + b^*\right)\left(a + b\right) = a^*a +b^*b + a^*b + ab^*

= |a|^2 + |b|^2 + (a^*b) + (a^*b)^*
Adding a number to its complex conjugate eliminates the imaginary component and doubles the real component.
= |a|^2 + |b|^2 + 2Re\left\{a^*b \right\}

Consider what happens when a = b.

Edit: perhaps I'm missing something though

2Re(a*b) = 2|a|^2, 2|b|^2 and then overall I would get 4|a|^2 or 4|b|^2, which again gives me N_{S}=1/2, but I need N_{S} = 1/ \sqrt{2} so I'm not really sure what to do
 
Perhaps I replied without sufficient knowledge. It might be that the number of states has been halved (identical particles).
 
phosgene said:
ψ(x_{1},x_{2}) = N_{S}[ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2}) + ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1})]

This is the wavefunction for two identical particles, specifically bosons. The wave function is required to satisfy the symmetry equation you stated. To solve, we have |N_{S}|^2∫[ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2}) + ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1})]^{*}[ψ_{a}(x_{1})ψ_{b}(x_{2}) + ψ_{a}(x_{2})ψ_{b}(x_{1})]dx_{1}dx_{2}=1. Expand this equation out carefully. It is always possible to orthonormalize using Gram-Schmidt so that ∫|ψ_{a}(x_{1})^2|=1 and ∫ψ_{a}(x_{1})^{*}ψ_{b}(x_{1})=0. This should give you N_{S} = 1/√2.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top