Normalization of ψ(x,0) - Can you tell me if my solution is correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter S_Flaherty
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normalization
S_Flaherty
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
We are given ψ(x,0) = A[ψ1(x)+ψ2(x)] and for the first part of my homework problem it asks us to normalize ψ(x,0) (it says find A).

What I did was ∫|ψ(x,0)|^2 dx = 1 = (|A|^2)∫(ψ1^2 + 2ψ1ψ2 + ψ2^2)dx and since
∫ψm(x)*ψn(x)dx = 0 when m≠n and it equals 1 when m=n I can make the integral equal to
(A^2)(1 + 2(0) + 1) = 1 so A^2 = 1/2, so A = 1/4.

Did I solve this correctly or did I completely misunderstand what I was doing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
S_Flaherty said:
We are given ψ(x,0) = A[ψ1(x)+ψ2(x)] and for the first part of my homework problem it asks us to normalize ψ(x,0) (it says find A).

What I did was ∫|ψ(x,0)|^2 dx = 1 = (|A|^2)∫(ψ1^2 + 2ψ1ψ2 + ψ2^2)dx and since
∫ψm(x)*ψn(x)dx = 0 when m≠n and it equals 1 when m=n I can make the integral equal to
(A^2)(1 + 2(0) + 1) = 1 so A^2 = 1/2, so A = 1/4.

Did I solve this correctly or did I completely misunderstand what I was doing?

No.

It's correct up to \displaystyle {\text{A}\!^2}= \frac{1}{2}\ .

How do you solve for A after that?
 
SammyS said:
No.

It's correct up to \displaystyle {\text{A}\!^2}= \frac{1}{2}\ .

How do you solve for A after that?

I just did the math wrong, I got A = 0.7071.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top