Normalized equation for particle in a ring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correct normalization for a particle in a ring where the potential is zero on the ring and infinite elsewhere. The user initially attempted to normalize the wave function using the integral involving the arc length, leading to confusion over the normalization constant. However, the correct approach is to use the integral of the probability density function in terms of the angle θ, not arc length. The consensus is that the normalization should be done with the integral of |ψ(θ)|² dθ, ensuring the total probability equals one. This clarification emphasizes the one-dimensional nature of the problem along the ring.
Titan97
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


Normalized equation for particle in a ring, where V=0 on a ring of radius 'a' and infinite everywhere else.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Replcing x by rθ,
$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2I}\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial\theta^2}=E\psi$$
By guess, I found out that ##Ae^{ik\theta}## is an eigenfunction of the hamiltonian.
To find ##A##, I used:
$$\int_0^{2\pi}|\psi|^2rd\theta=1$$
But in the solution, they used
$$\int_0^{2\pi}|\psi|^2d\theta=1$$So the normalization constants were different. Which one is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Titan97 said:

Homework Statement


Normalized equation for particle in a ring, where V=0 on a ring of radius 'a' and infinite everywhere else.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Replcing x by rθ,
$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2I}\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial\theta^2}=E\psi$$
By guess, I found out that ##Ae^{ik\theta}## is an eigenfunction of the hamiltonian.
To find ##A##, I used:
$$\int_0^{2\pi}|\psi|^2rd\theta=1$$
But in the solution, they used
$$\int_0^{2\pi}|\psi|^2d\theta=1$$So the normalization constants were different. Which one is correct?

You are not integrating a function of ##r, \theta## over two dimensions. It's a simple one-dimensional integral for ##\theta##.
 
the particle moves along a ring. so the elemental length should be rdtheta
 
Titan97 said:
the particle moves along a ring. so the elemental length should be rdtheta

You've defined your ##\psi## in terms of ##\theta##. ##|\psi|^2## is the probability density function in terms of ##\theta##, not in terms of ##l## where ##l## is the arc length along the ring.

Normalisation means that the total proability is 1, so the simple integral of ##|\psi(\theta)|^2 d\theta## is required.

If you transformed ##\psi## into a function of arc length, ##l##, then you would integrate ##|\psi(l)|^2 dl##.

To illustrate this, a constant pdf for ##\theta## would be ##p(\theta) = \frac{1}{2 \pi}##, whereas a constant pdf for ##l## would be ##p(l) = \frac{1}{2 \pi a}##
 
  • Like
Likes Titan97
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top