Normalized equation for particle in a ring

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the correct normalization for a particle in a ring where the potential is zero on the ring and infinite elsewhere. The user initially attempted to normalize the wave function using the integral involving the arc length, leading to confusion over the normalization constant. However, the correct approach is to use the integral of the probability density function in terms of the angle θ, not arc length. The consensus is that the normalization should be done with the integral of |ψ(θ)|² dθ, ensuring the total probability equals one. This clarification emphasizes the one-dimensional nature of the problem along the ring.
Titan97
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


Normalized equation for particle in a ring, where V=0 on a ring of radius 'a' and infinite everywhere else.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Replcing x by rθ,
$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2I}\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial\theta^2}=E\psi$$
By guess, I found out that ##Ae^{ik\theta}## is an eigenfunction of the hamiltonian.
To find ##A##, I used:
$$\int_0^{2\pi}|\psi|^2rd\theta=1$$
But in the solution, they used
$$\int_0^{2\pi}|\psi|^2d\theta=1$$So the normalization constants were different. Which one is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Titan97 said:

Homework Statement


Normalized equation for particle in a ring, where V=0 on a ring of radius 'a' and infinite everywhere else.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Replcing x by rθ,
$$-\frac{\hbar^2}{2I}\frac{\partial^2\psi}{\partial\theta^2}=E\psi$$
By guess, I found out that ##Ae^{ik\theta}## is an eigenfunction of the hamiltonian.
To find ##A##, I used:
$$\int_0^{2\pi}|\psi|^2rd\theta=1$$
But in the solution, they used
$$\int_0^{2\pi}|\psi|^2d\theta=1$$So the normalization constants were different. Which one is correct?

You are not integrating a function of ##r, \theta## over two dimensions. It's a simple one-dimensional integral for ##\theta##.
 
the particle moves along a ring. so the elemental length should be rdtheta
 
Titan97 said:
the particle moves along a ring. so the elemental length should be rdtheta

You've defined your ##\psi## in terms of ##\theta##. ##|\psi|^2## is the probability density function in terms of ##\theta##, not in terms of ##l## where ##l## is the arc length along the ring.

Normalisation means that the total proability is 1, so the simple integral of ##|\psi(\theta)|^2 d\theta## is required.

If you transformed ##\psi## into a function of arc length, ##l##, then you would integrate ##|\psi(l)|^2 dl##.

To illustrate this, a constant pdf for ##\theta## would be ##p(\theta) = \frac{1}{2 \pi}##, whereas a constant pdf for ##l## would be ##p(l) = \frac{1}{2 \pi a}##
 
  • Like
Likes Titan97
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K