Normalizing wave functions / superposition

582153236
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
A remote control shot a single photon at a window that has a 50% chance of transmitting and
50% chance of reflecting photons. Once the photon wavepacket hits the glass (without an observer present), it propagates as a superposition of states, one in which it was transmitted and one in which it was reflected. We can write down ψphoton as being in a superposition of states ψtransmitted and ψreflected as follows:
ψphoton = c(ψtransmitted + ψreflected)
where c is some normalization constant. Let’s assume ψtransmitted and
ψreflected are a set of orthonormal functions. i.e.,

ψmψm dτ = 1

ψmψn dτ = 0

Find the normalization constant, c and What does the wavefunction of a single photon become if the detector
of the TV on the opposite side of the window registers the photon?

Any idea how I'm supposed to begin finding the normalization constant? I'm confused since the wave functions aren't explicitly given.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fapyfapy said:
A remote control shot a single photon at a window that has a 50% chance of transmitting and
50% chance of reflecting photons. Once the photon wavepacket hits the glass (without an observer present), it propagates as a superposition of states, one in which it was transmitted and one in which it was reflected. We can write down ψphoton as being in a superposition of states ψtransmitted and ψreflected as follows:
ψphoton = c(ψtransmitted + ψreflected)
where c is some normalization constant. Let’s assume ψtransmitted and
ψreflected are a set of orthonormal functions. i.e.,

ψmψm dτ = 1

ψmψn dτ = 0

Find the normalization constant, c and What does the wavefunction of a single photon become if the detector
of the TV on the opposite side of the window registers the photon?

Any idea how I'm supposed to begin finding the normalization constant? I'm confused since the wave functions aren't explicitly given.
If the inner product of wave functions ##\psi_m## and ##\psi_n## is denoted as ##\langle \psi_m | \psi_n \rangle##, you have
\langle \psi_r | \psi_r \rangle = \langle \psi_t | \psi_t \rangle = 1\\<br /> \langle \psi_r | \psi_t \rangle = \langle \psi_t | \psi_r \rangle = 0<br />
Here, ##\psi_r = \psi_{\text{reflected}}##, ##\psi_t = \psi_{\text{transmitted}}##, and let ##\psi_p = \psi_{\text{photon}}##.
You want ##\langle \psi_p | \psi_p \rangle = 1##. Now just use standard properties of ##\langle \cdot|\cdot \rangle##.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top