Notation for marking the voltage drop in this picture

AI Thread Summary
The voltage drop notation V_0 in the diagram refers to the potential difference between the two rightmost nodes, as indicated by the context of the circuit. It is common practice to denote voltage across elements in circuit diagrams, and this notation typically signifies the voltage across the associated element, which in this case is the current generator. While there are standard conventions for marking voltages, they may not be universally applied across all circuit diagrams. The discussion highlights that the notation can vary and may not always follow a consistent rule. Overall, the marked voltage indicates the potential difference across the current generator element.
LongApple
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When we write the V_0 on the right of the diagram as show below, between which two points does the voltage drop refer to? There are two nodes on the top correct? I am assuming the voltage drop refers to the two rightmost nodes.

I've tried to circle the nodes.

See this link:

http://i.imgur.com/kutasHe.png

Homework Equations


It's just a notation question.

The Attempt at a Solution


It's not a homework problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
LongApple said:
I am assuming the voltage drop refers to the two rightmost nodes.
Good assumption.

Boy, what a lousy problem.
 
What is the rule for the notation in general?

Is it common to just mark voltage as height on the paper as opposed to between specific nodes?
 
Are there standard conventions/notations for circuit diagrams? I'm certain there almost have to be. Are they universally applied? Not in the 50 odd years I've been deciphering them. Check NEMA, IEEE, Giaccaletto, Kaufman & Seidman, who else ...
 
Because it's written beside an element, I'd say in general a marked voltage will be the voltage across that element. Yes, in this case it follows that it's the potential difference between the rightmost nodes.
 
NascentOxygen said:
Because it's written beside an element, I'd say in general a marked voltage will be the voltage across that element.
And that element is the current generator. So the marked voltage is across it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top