Nuclear Chemistry: Kinetics of Radioactive Decay and Radioactive Dating

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a homework problem involving the exposure of a laboratory rat to alpha radiation with an activity of 11.3 mCi. The activity is calculated to be 4.2X10^8 disintegrations per second and 4.2X10^8 becquerels. The participant is seeking guidance on how to calculate the absorbed dose in grays after converting the radiation activity. They express uncertainty about the methodology for part B of the problem, specifically regarding the calculation of absorbed dose. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity on the approach to calculating radiation dose metrics.
redpanda320
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A laboratory rat is exposed to an alpha-radiation source whose activity is 11.3 mCi. What is the activity of the radiation in disintegrations per second? in becquerels? The rat has a mass
of 315 grams and is exposed to the radiation for 12.3 seconds, absorbing 39% of the emitted alpha particles, each having an energy of 9.10X10^-13 Jeules. Calculate the absorbed does in millirads and grays. If the RBE of the radiation is 9.5, calculate the effective absorbed dose in mrem and Sv.
Activity of the radiation in disintegrations per second= 4.2X10^8 dis/s
Activity of the radiation in becquerels= 4.2X10^8 Bq

Homework Equations


ln (Nt/N0)= -kt
k= 0.693/t1/2
E=mc2


The Attempt at a Solution


I started answering the question by converting the given amount of mCi to Ci.
Then converting that amount into dis/s and then into Bq.

After that, I was not exactly sure how to approach part B. A push in the right direction would help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can anyone at least tell me a method or something for how to figure out how to calculate the absorbed dose in grays?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top